Should The Modern Audience Reimagine Shakespeare's Most Notorious Character?

Should The Modern Audience Reimagine Shakespeare's Most Notorious Character?

"Hath not a Jew...warmed and cooled by the same winter and summer as a Christian is?" - "The Merchant of Venice," Act III.1

26
views

Although technically, within theatrical jargon, the play "The Merchant of Venice" is characterized as a comedy, which meant during Shakespeare's time a play with a happy ending--and the full title of the play is "The Comical History of the Merchant of Venice, or Otherwise Called the Jew of Venice"--that "comedy" label would only apply to some characters. Since Antonio is technically the "Merchant of Venice," he clearly has a happy ending, while "the Jew of Venice," which would be Shylock, has a tragic story. Although he does not die in the end--but it is implied--he does not have a pleasant point-of-view, for it is filled with anger, resentment, exclusion, and the ultimately forced assimilation.

To provide a summary, "The Merchant of Venice" was written by William Shakespeare during Queen Elizabeth's reign in 1594. It takes place in Venice. Antonio is a merchant who has sent his argosies to the New World, who is willing to pay for Bassianus's debt to the usurer Shylock, who has a personal grudge against Antonio and is willing to lend him money in exchange for a pound of Antonio's flesh lest he cannot pay Shylock back. Meanwhile, Portia is a wealthy heiress who has to choose a suitor based on which one chooses the right casket, according to her deceased father's wishes; which Bassianus wishes to woo and choose the right casket. However, besides the basic comedy aspects, there is a tragic point-of-view that is taken by Shylock.

For some audience members who also belong to marginalized demographics, Shylock is the personification of their histories, and it would not be hard to see how, since Shylock's occupation involves a trade no one in the majority is willing to do, he is the constant victim of prejudice by Antonio and his friends, he is biased against by the Venetian court, and he is forced to abandon his identity at the end of the play. In the IMDb page of the Maori translation of "The Merchant of Venice," it explains how significant this film was since it was the first Maori-language film ever produced, and it depicts Shylock as a sympathetic minority character. Considering how the indigenous Maori were subjugated by the British when they colonized New Zealand, all of Shylock's struggles can easily relate to theirs. It even begins with Shylock's "Hath not a Jew eyes" monologue at the beginning as he cries.

Definitely, that monologue Shylock delivers to Antonio's friends is the prime component of determining whether Shylock is a sympathetic character or a bloodthirsty villain. It is especially important since he takes the opportunity to vent his reasons to Saleria and Solanio since they ask him what he intends to do with Antonio's pound of flesh. Shylock does not want the pound of flesh itself, rather the means of getting it, in other words, he wishes to inflict pain upon Antonio. He goes on to say that he is trying to survive just like the rest of the Venetians and the only reason why Antonio is undermining his business and abusing him is that he is Jewish. Shylock concludes by saying that he will resemble the Christians in their desire for vengeance.

Within that monologue, Shylock provides his rationalizations not just to Antonio's friends (and the nearby prostitutes in the Al Pacino version) but to the audience as well. Palestinian actor Makram J. Khoury especially highlights this as Shylock when turning from a laughing Salerio to the people around him and then back at Salerio. In this way, the audience along with the characters are given the opportunity to understand Shylock's struggles in Venetian society.

Indeed, Shylock also points out the hypocrisy among the Christians in the trial scene when he tells them all that they are allowed to own slaves and not even treat them fairly. Outside of Shylock's awareness, hypocrisy abounds the city-state of Venice as well as the rural Belmont. Portia preaches the "Quality of Mercy" when trying to convince Shylock not to take Antonio's flesh, and yet she does not have mercy to suitors who choose the wrong caskets and condemns them to live the rest of their lives in celibacy. When audience members look at how the Venetians treat each other and Shylock, it is no wonder that they would be more inclined to side with Shylock than Portia, Bassiano, Antonio, or any of the other characters.

As Agnes Heller from the philosophy and social theory journal "Critical Horizons" and Brian Weinstein from the "Jewish Bible Quarterly" pointed out, Shylock is even more interesting than those other characters. He experiences a wide variety of emotions, from sadness to happiness to anger. Though even Shylock has a negative side since almost none of the characters in "The Merchant of Venice" appear to be absolvable. Not only is Shylock intent on possibly killing Antonio, and even hopes the argosies Antonio has sent to maintain his wealth are destroyed, he constantly abuses his clown-servant Lancelot. He gives him contradictory commands, which causes him to leave as soon as he is reunited with his long-lost father. So, there does not seem to be a way to rewrite Shylock's relationship with Lancelot or the troubles he himself externalizes within his own household that causes his daughter Jessica to flee with Lorenzo with his ducats.

Without a doubt, "The Merchant of Venice" represents a lot of people the very definition of anti-Semitism. So much so, that the very name "Shylock" has wormed its way into the English language to mean "loan shark." However, upon actually reading the play, Shylock actually cares less about money and more about his revenge against Antonio for his constant harassment. He even ignores the bond given to him--and more--and continues his attempt to take Antonio's pound of flesh. In this case, his desire for revenge outweighs his desire for wealth. In another instance, Shylock relates to his fellow Jew, Tubal, how he kept a turquoise given to him by a woman named Leah, who was presumably his wife. Upon hearing that his daughter, Jessica, sold it to buy a monkey, he angrily states that he would not sell it for a wilderness of monkeys, thus showing the value he places on Leah which is more than the turquoise itself.

However, there is more to the conversation than the anti-Semitism that is typical within "The Merchant of Venice." Shakespearean actor Patrick Stewart points out the complexities of portraying Shylock, who was either depicted as a comical villain or as a sympathetic minority character. Not only does Shylock's dialogue give off hints that he has genuine grievances about Antonio kicking at, spitting at, and insulting him, but the original play does not dictate HOW the character should be portrayed or even how he is even dressed. A myriad of performances can paint Shylock in completely different ways, whether--as Stewart mentioned a reviewer who described them--as the "wolfish, murderous, bloodthirsty dog Jew (as Antonio, Salerio, and Graziano call Shylock)" or as the "noble, suffering, dignified member of a persecuted race." Today's society would definitely be more inclined with the latter portrayal of Shylock, especially in the post-World War II world when fairly recently in world history the entire Jewish nation was threatened with extermination during the Holocaust.

There have also been political implications in the productions of "The Merchant of Venice." The blatant anti-Semitism that is largely associated with the play is most definitely found outside of the play since it was staged as part of Nazi propaganda. However, "The Merchant of Venice" was also played in Tel Aviv in the Habima Theater in a Hebrew translation in 1936, along with another production staged during the Arab-Israeli War (1967) depicting Shylock as the personification of Jewish oppression. Although fierce controversies emerge in Israel and Palestine as a result of these productions, what does remain is the fact that "The Merchant of Venice" continues to be staged.

Should there be an ethical, responsible way to re-interpret "The Merchant of Venice" as a play? I think it is important to understand that in the historical context when Shakespeare wrote this play, it was written during a time when Jews only recently were allowed to enter England under Queen Elizabeth. As for the background behind the original staging of "The Merchant of Venice," it was shown to an English audience taking place in Venice, which Shakespeare himself has never been to. So, to understand how to re-interpret "The Merchant of Venice" is to understand that Shakespeare is not the demigod of the literary arts that he is mythologized into being, since although he developed really intricate, colorful characters, he had a narrow ethos when it came to the background. Brian Weinstein makes it a point that Shakespeare was completely unfamiliar with the teachings in the Talmud, which led to Shylock directly contradicting its basic teachings.

Of course, modern perspectives on Shylock also come into question. Although Weinstein points out the fact that Shylock strays from Judaism, the issue with his character is that he only seems to reference his Jewish teachings in order to legitimize his usury. Shylock does not act upon getting Antonio's pound of flesh by Talmudic teachings, but by how he perceives is the Christians' notion of revenge. He even concludes his famous monologue:

"The villainy you teach me, I will execute. It shall go hard, but I will better the instruction."

No matter how much attention is given to the original interpretation of Shakespeare's play, the result might be an imperfect rendition. Stewart attempted to replicate the original Shylock as the comical villain, but the reality is that the very posh that he used is itself a modern method of communication. The English language is spoken today, specifically Modern British English, is completely different from the Early Modern English spoken in Shakespeare's time. A notable feature of both Stewart's and David Suchet's (who is Jewish himself) performances is the lack of rhoticity, meaning that they pronounced the words without the "r," so "hurt" becomes [huht] and sir becomes [suh].

Stewart also seemed to have a simplified view of Shylock's status, almost coming off as tone-deaf. Not to be too hard of Patrick Stewart because he's, well, Patrick Stewart, but he argued too confidently that "Shylock is an outsider who just so happens to be a Jew," which completely ignores the broader context that led to Shylock's "Hath not a Jew eyes" monologue. Although Suchet argued that he is an outsider "BECAUSE he is a Jew," I can definitely see where Stewart may have come to that conclusion. When Shylock searches for his ducats and his daughter, he manages to get Venetians to help him, which indicates that if Shylock really was excluded, no one in that society would care about what happened to his daughter or any of his possessions. In other instances, Shylock has access to go wherever he wants, since he has permission from the jailer to meet Antonio before the trial scene. He is also allowed to practice usury, practice Judaism (for most of the play), and go to the Venetian court. However, Shylock would not have been called "dog," practiced usury, or be abused by Antonio if he was not Jewish to begin with.

If "The Merchant of Venice" is given new adaptations, then the re-imaginings would be less political and more contextual. Since Shakespeare is not as monolithic as he actually was, we as the modern audience have enough creative liberty to interpret "The Merchant of Venice" differently from Shakespeare's own interpretation. Since no preservation nor subversion seems to be suitable in producing the play, it would be best to let the character of Shylock become autonomous and let him speak from his own mouth and no one else's. Plenty of Shakespeare's plays were already re-interpreted, including "The Merchant of Venice," either taking place in a different time period or having their themes entirely altered. Although John Barton of "RSC: Playing Shakespeare" TV series stated that Shakespeare's characters were a mixture of black and white and that adapters tend to either solely focus on the black parts or the white parts, these characters need not reflect the issues at the time period in when they were created.


Images Attributions: TBradac. "SOC Merchant of Venice - Shylock." Wikimedia. August 5, 2009. Creative Commons Attribution Share Alike 4.0 International. Changes include adapting image of Shylock (played by Michael Nehring) into a personally designed background.

Scott III, Robert. "Summer-And-Winter (2)." Flickr. Uploaded on December 20, 2018.

Popular Right Now

To The High School Senior, It's Not All About College Applications

Finish strong, be mindful of your needs, and live in peace.

735
views

I wish I could have said this all last year, that you will never have it as easy as you do right now. It's the end of the road for childhood and you're wondering what else do I do with my life now that I'm going to college? It's a mix of emotions and feelings that are hard to process. My goal is telling you this is the year to do everything fun and live like you haven't before. This doesn't mean skip school on the daily and get bad grades(it matters until the end because of college).

But above all else, don't let college applications define your year. People think applying to college is the story of what happens senior year(which is mostly true but I promise that is not the only thing that matters). There is so much more to life than college applications and laughing how everyone becomes depressed their last year from being around the same people. If I could tell myself last year, it would be this:

First, it would be to not argue with people at all. This last year is simply too scared to fight and argue with people over nothing. Do your best to be kind to everyone and not cause problems for other people. Everyone deserves to have a nice senior year.

Second, enjoy being able to live in your own room and not share with anyone else. Once you get to college there's going to be a lot of unnecessary noise that you sort of get used to living with.

Next, do not take an abundance of college classes. They're only going to help you but so much and you're not going to want to do the work anyway. Don't be one of those people who does this and doesn't feel the need to have a social life. It's no joke, recognize you're human and be mindful of your needs.

In addition, there is no such thing as a perfect school. Every school has its flaws and most of the time when people say yes, they're saying yes to the marketing campaign the school has. There is a large difference between the marketing campaign for the school and actually living there. It's always good to go to your top school and tour a second time so you know what definitely fits you.

Most importantly, do not be too consumed in your cell phone and pretend that you don't care about anything. That's like a lame childish response pretending you don't have feelings. And for those that still think this is the way to go, I can't wait until you take a sociology class and learn about how humans are dependent on one another.

Appreciate everything mom and dad have done for you. Do not fuss about what is put on the dinner table, and instead be grateful that they took their time to prepare a meal for YOU. Nothing compares to mom's home-cooked meals. Because that dining hall food can really mess you up.

You will be working the 9-5 all day every day. There will be more work, you will be stressed out about reading around 300 pages of material per week, and have the stress of having two tests as the only semester grades.

Lastly, you will actually have to adult for the first time ever in college and find what keeps you motivated. It's not a hand holding game with constant support. You have the opportunity to do a lot by yourself but also with others.

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

6 Things That Just Shouldn't Exist

Why would they do that?

3
views

Okay folks! It's time, once again, for an Anna Bechtel article where I am a grumpy old lady and complain about things that shouldn't exist.

Why? Because I feel like it. And because I can. And I haven't done this in a week.

Here we go.

1. Wireless earbuds

upload.wikimedia.org

We don't need these. They're way too small, and they look stupid. Even the non-Apple ones look stupid. We have perfectly working earbuds. We don't need these.

2. Electronics that aren't their normal size

c1.staticflickr.com

The tablets are like huge phones. The phones are smaller tablets. The computers are normal sized tablets. WHY? Just make each product around a certain size!

3. Stan Twitter & Terms

pngimg.com

If I read one more "ugh, her mind," "skinny legend," "iconic," "goddess," or "boy bye," I am going to personally report everyone doing this. Unless it's done ironically or sarcastically. Plus these people are fuckin insane. Who has this much time?!

4. Dating Shows 

Whether it's The Bachelor and it's 20 spin-offs, Are You The One, or anything else, we just need to stop with these dating shows. Hardly any of these couples ever stay together, and it's not like these people are actually doing something interesting. However, some of these contestants do make good podcasts after the show. Hmm, why isn't podcasting a reality competition? I gotta produce this. Let me drop out of college real quick.

5. Balloons

Giphy

Honestly, why? They don't do anything. If you accidentally let them go, you'll never see them again and they will become litter. They deflate in a week. And they pop easily. There's no point to them.

6. Glow Sticks

Giphy

Okay, first of all, "glow" sticks? They hardly even glow. Also, they're way too tight, and uncomfortable to wear, you can only use them for one night, and if they break, you die. Not worth it.

Related Content

Facebook Comments