5 Reasons We Need To Free The Nipple
Start writing a post
Politics and Activism

5 Reasons We Need To Free The Nipple

If you grow a human, you should be able to feed it whenever, wherever, and however you please.

5 Reasons We Need To Free The Nipple
Free the Nipple

Free the Nipple is not a movement out to force every woman to go topless wherever men can. It is about giving women the option to be shirtless, free of harassment and judgment. Free the Nipple denounces sexist censorship and harmful double standards. It is about ending the hypersexualization of women’s breasts and bodies.

At what age do we begin sexualizing young girls? At what age do we continue to let boys run around shirtless, but shame girls into covering up? These double standards are harmful for a number of reasons, most of which can lead to shame, insecurity and damaging feelings of inferiority. Here are five reasons we need to Free the Nipple:

1. Breastfeeding

If you grow a human you should be able to feed it whenever, wherever and however you please. Not to mention, breastfeeding is the sole purpose of breasts and nipples. There is nothing shameful about breastfeeding one’s baby in public, and the fact that many women are harassed for feeding their baby is absurd. How is it more acceptable to use women’s breasts to sell burgers than to feed babies?

2. Slut Shaming

Breasts are not sexual organs. Can they produce sexual pleasure? Yes. But so can lips, ears, necks, knees, feet, and toes. Is it illegal to be in public without your face mask, earmuffs, turtleneck, long pants, and closed-toed boots? No, because no other body part is sexualized outside of sexual context. We need to stop associating exposed skin with sex. Women should not be shamed for having or exposing their breasts (whether it is to feed their baby or mow their lawn). We need to stop judging women based on how much cleavage they bare. There is zero difference between male and female breasts outside of the fact that women’s breasts serve a pretty important purpose. There are many terrible things a person can be; topless is not one of them.

3. Victim Blaming

Women are often blamed (or blame themselves) for being sexually assaulted. What one was wearing when they were assaulted is totally irrelevant. It doesn’t matter if she was wearing nothing but a thong to the bar no one is entitled to another person’s body. Ever. It is never the victim’s fault. Sexual assault and violence are always about power. It is never about how big or small one’s top was. No one says, “You were walking in public with a wallet. You were asking for it,” when someone gets mugged. If breast exposure and small clothes caused rape, assaults would skyrocket in the summer. They don't. Cleavage is not an open invitation. Cleavage is not consent.

4. Body Positivity

Because we heavily sexualize women’s breasts (and demonize all things sex), many women are ashamed and insecure about their breasts. Most women are uncomfortable seeing other women’s breasts as well as baring their own ("Orange is the New Black" completely desensitized me). Consequently, many girls and women grow up only seeing surgically altered and photoshopped breasts, which can deepen insecurities. They don’t see the variety in shape, size and symmetry. This is not to say that everyone should be comfortable walking around topless in front of friends and family. What one chooses to do with their body is their choice. But one should not be ashamed of their body and our culture should not enforce said shame. All breasts and bodies are beautiful. There is no ideal. There is no one way breasts should look.

5. Basic Equality

As previously mentioned, telling young girls and women their bodies have to be covered in ways that boys’ bodies don’t is harmful. It instills shame and insecurity that lasts a lifetime. If it is legal and acceptable for men to be shirtless in various public spaces (including online), it should be legal and acceptable for women as well.

It is little known that it has not always been legal for men to be shirtless in public. Men used to be forced to wear nipple-covering swimsuits at public pools and beaches. Eighty years ago, in 1936, men were granted the right to bare their nipples. Men, much like women today, had to protest the outrageousness of calling their nipples "obscene." The group of protesters below was arrested in 1935 at a beach in Atlantic City for “baring their torsos.”

Today, it is still illegal for women to be topless in 35 states. In some states, this includes breastfeeding (meaning it is illegal to feed your baby in public). Even in states that legalized toplessness (looking at you, New York), police officers continue to arrest women for not covering their chests.

Regardless of your position on what amount of clothing is appropriate in public, it is hard to refute that allowing men to expose their chests but not allowing women to do the same is sexist. Women are not objects to be used for commercials and sex. Women are humans and deserve to be treated as such. Our bodies are our own and their existence is not to be possessed, covered or controlled.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Student Life

Social Media Or Soul Media

To the generation that cares way too much about affirmation.

Emma Smith
  • This semester I am taking the ever so famous class, Writing 101. Walking into it, I had heard the horror stories about each major assignment. I have to admit, it’s not a class that I am fond of. But, major assignment #2 got me thinking, we had to create a research question based off of a topic that we are interested in.

Two weeks prior, I watched a very interesting documentary on Netflix. Miss Representation was recommended to me by one of my friends and I have to say the topic is absolutely mind blowing. Social Media and Female Body Image. How Social Media makes girls see this unnatural perfection of ‘beauty’ that really doesn’t exist. But female body image isn’t the only thing affected by social media.

Keep Reading... Show less

Sex And The Church

A letter to fellow believers.

Amanda Hayes
  • I know many of you just read that title and thought it was scandalous to see something so “risque” in the same setting as something holy. Well guess what – sex is part of that. Everyone seems to think they are separate, which makes since because most people treat them as though they are complete polar opposites. Shall we think this through?

Who created the Church body? God. Who created the body? Also God. If we know God to be the creator of all things, we cannot leave sex out of that equation. God created sex, people! Praise Him! Like all great things, the world has twisted and perverted it. The world has stained it so badly that even many church congregations see it only as stained and keep quiet about that part of God’s word. Many people know that God told Adam and Eve to “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28), but a lot of people overlook the entirety of Song of Solomon. The entire book is dedicated to telling of the love and sex between man and wife. God blessed us with the gift of intimacy, one to be shared between husband and wife. Church if we teach of sex as the blessing that it is, more people will start treating it as such. If we stop viewing sex as this unspeakable act, the temptation would be lessened. With the fall of man, humans naturally desire things they should not have. So if more people speak of it with gladness and praise, and do not hide it in the darkness as if it were vile, fewer people would be drawn to it for the wrong reasons. More people would appreciate it for what it is: a gift from God.

Keep Reading... Show less

Chick-fil-A, I love you.

Keep Reading... Show less

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

Is God Reckless?

First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments