Nuclear Weapons In North Korea: Peaceful Negotiations are Possible
Start writing a post

Nuclear Weapons In North Korea: Peaceful Negotiations are Possible

Continued negotiations may prove to be worthwhile.

Nuclear Weapons In North Korea: Peaceful Negotiations are Possible

North Korea, the Democratic People's Republic of Korea, began its nuclear program in the 1950s, and in the years between then and the 1960s, a number of programs were created. The North Korean government created two programs, the Atomic Energy Research Institute and the Academy of Sciences. However, the real nuclear testing began when the state struck up an agreement with the Soviet Union, and in the late 1950s, nuclear workers were being trained in the Soviet Union.

Over time, North Korea shifted its stance on Nuclear production from active to inactive, depending on the policies that the government puts forth or agrees to at the time. The state of North Korea is the only state to have ever removed themselves from a treaty that supports the non-use of nuclear weapons, the Treaty on the Nonproliferation of Nuclear Weapons which indicates their lack of caring about peace in terms of nuclear warfare. North Korea has continually disregarded and violated the international norms opposing nuclear testing, between the years of 2009-2017. The international community has repeatedly attempted to end North Korea's nuclear testing, and have been unsuccessful.

In 2018, talks of re-starting the shutting down of North Korea's nuclear programs began again, and during the current President of the United State's term, President Trump has made repeated attempts to negotiate with Supreme Leader Kim Jong-un. Despite President Trump's attempts at peace and Kim Jong-un's apparent interest in denuclearization, North Korea has continued to fire missiles and conduct nuclear testing. Some of the believed causes of this policy issue are the state's repeated belief in its need to assert itself as a dominant state. By flaunting its nuclear program, North Korea insists upon keeping its missiles, to prove to surrounding nations just how powerful it is. In the past, attempts to end North Korea's nuclear programs have ranged from peace talks with negotiations, offering things in exchange for denuclearization. The success of these policies has varied, with the state agreeing in some instances but refusing to do so in others. In the end, however, North Korea has not complied and has continued to conduct nuclear tests.

Open communication is an extremely effective tool in promoting the reduction or completion of nuclear disarmament, and by collaborating on treaties and policies with other major powers, the actual involvement and commitment to these policies can occur. By collaborating on such treaties, the U.S. can hold these other nations across the globe accountable in reducing the use of nuclear weapons. In the past, such treaties have been accepted but then violated by North Korea, but this policy option would attempt to solve this issue of commitment.

According to the U.S. Department of State, as of October 7, 2019, a new treaty was proposed called "Creating [the] Environment for Nuclear Disarmament" which seeks to communicate with interested countries and prioritize taking steps to an environment focused on nuclear disarmament. In the brief, "U.S. Priorities in the UN First Committee," Ambassador Robert Wood does an overview of some of the current global priorities of the U.S., including "... a focus on the security threats posed by Iran, North Korea, Syria, Venezuela, Russia, and China to the existing international order" as well as creating "...the environment necessary for further nuclear disarmament." This will help in the U.S.'s attempts to continue peaceful talks with North Korea in hopes of future denuclearization.
Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

Is God Reckless?

First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.

Keep Reading... Show less
Student Life

10 Signs You Grew Up In A Small Town

Whether you admit it or not, that tiny town will always have your heart.

The Odyssey

1. You still talk to people that you went to elementary school with.

These are the people you grew up with and the people you graduated high school with. The faces you see in kindergarten are the same faces you’ll see for the rest of your life.

Keep Reading... Show less
Student Life

150 Words For Anyone Who Loves Football Games

Why I love high school football games, even though I don't like football.

Dallas News

When most think of high school they think of friend drama, parties, getting your drivers license, and best of all foot ball games.

Keep Reading... Show less

10 Greatest Speeches In Modern American History

The United States is a relatively infantile nation, but its legacy of spoken rhetoric is one of the richest in the world.


Rhetoric, in all its forms, arrives under the scrutiny of historians both for its historical impact and literary value. Dozens of speeches have either rallied the nation together or driven it drastically apart –– the impact of speeches in politics, social movements, and wars is undeniable.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments