Feminism: A Misunderstood Definition

Feminism: A Misunderstood Definition

The word is synonymous with gender equality. Here's how.
6130
views

Few words in the English language spark more heated debate than the word feminism, a word with a double meaning and an expansive gap between the word’s actual definition and that by which society has defined it.

The result of the spreading of this misleading word’s inaccurate definition has led to miscommunication and much controversy; society’s warped understanding of feminism has caused prejudice and has unfortunately altered the word’s meaning to represent a movement that seeks female power and the ultimate destruction of male power. The word feminism has, to many, come to be synonymous with misandry. In fact, the word has potential to be quite misleading and has misled much of society’s understanding. In spite of the negative connotation undoubtedly often associated with the word regarding the destruction of the male gender and glorifying of the female gender, the altered definition of feminism is a result of a few radical belief sets defining a movement much grander than just a few. While society’s preconceived notion of feminism has acquired negative connotations over the years, and the word has come to mean the superiority of the female sex, this concept is a far cry from the true definition of the word: the equality of the sexes.

Despite the fact that in America and other Western countries, some of the more significant issues regarding gender roles involve objectification, Middle Eastern countries face a much more violent debate on gender, where even the idea of women learning to read and write is cause enough for deadly riots or even terrorist attacks. It is this type of world view that emphasizes why feminism stands for more than just female empowerment, that it also represents the need for society to understand that females are more than just objects of desire and that males are more than just those who control the females. In other words, rather than “destroying all men,” as society so often perceives the meaning of feminism, one would more accurately describe the term as both empowering women to become more independent and modifying societal expectations of both genders, male and female alike.

Although many understand that feminism does indeed mean the independent nature and empowerment of the female gender, what many may miss is that it also means the removal of masculine societal restrictions including stoic strength, lack of emotion, and the objectification of women that men are expected to uphold. This misled understanding results in the altering of society’s holistic view on the female gender as inherently weaker, as women are contrastingly expected to fit a very different gender role consisting of remaining ladylike, serving their husbands, and generally catering to the male gender with regards to leadership roles. For example, women, unlike men, are often reduced to sexualized icons, at least in Western culture. More specifically, female celebrities are easily criticized according to fashion choices or body type, whereas their male counterparts are less judged on appearance. Modern tabloid covers are riddled with headings akin to “Lose 10 pounds today!” or “Get the summer body you want!” and are heavily advertised with scantily clad women who often are unnaturally thin and free of all natural flaws; the media manipulates society’s interpretation of women through use of computer editing software and clever studio modifications, which creates unrealistic standards for females.

This is not to say that males are not criticized on body type because yet again, media coverage of conventionally attractive males being tall, lean, and muscular also sets unrealistic goals for men to achieve. The difference between the unrealistic goals men face and those faced by women lies in centuries-old societal norms that women are expected to alter their appearance in order to cater the wishes of men, a fact supported by evidence as simple as the terms used to refer to those who live single lives. While a single, middle-aged man may be referred to as “a bachelor” or “independent,” women of the same age who remain single are considered undesirable and are referred to with more negative terms such as “cat lady” or “old maid.”

While the definition of feminism entails the equality of the genders, society’s view of the word has evolved into something quite different, as most would define the word feminism as the superiority of the female gender. Moreover, some “feminists” are misandrists in thinly veiled disguise (misandry meaning the belief that men are inferior to women) and claim that women would be better off without men. Sound familiar? While feminism is truly about more of an equal perspective on genders, the definition many associate with the word feminism is more accurately described as misandry. This false definition is widely accepted and is easily the reason the word feminism has acquired such a negative connotation. This is why, perhaps, the word feminism is such a misleading term, since the root “fem” is reminiscent of the word female, and to the ear sounds as though it literally means the superiority of the female gender.

It is true that society is generally prejudiced against the female gender, not just historically, but even in the modern world, as evidenced by various cultures’ treatment and expectations of women. Issues with gender have shifted over time to issues primarily involving social roles as opposed to civil rights issues in most modernized countries such as the United States, where laws are in place regarding equal pay, the right to vote, and the right to education. However, women in Middle Eastern countries, for instance, lack many of the rights to which males have the privilege. Feminism is by nature opposition to both misogyny (the idea that men are greater than women) and misandry (the concept that women are greater than men), yet the feminist movement is one whose definition has become inadvertently warped in its spreading through society.

The word feminism has evolved from its original meaning of equality of the genders to fit a negatively connoted word whose meaning is not unlike that of the word misandry; although society’s interpretation of the term has shifted its meaning, the word remains subject to debate. Unfortunately, the belief in this misunderstood definition is widely supported and is difficult to debunk, as a growing population may continue to globally perpetuate gender roles and continue to look upon the concept of feminism with disdain, huffing that the concept feminism is equivalent to wishing death upon the male gender. The subjective definition of the word feminism has been a topic of debate for years, perhaps centuries, and with various arguments over what the word means, the true meaning of the term for gender equality is lost in the waves as the ship that is language voyages boldly on.

Cover Image Credit: European Movement International

Popular Right Now

5 Perks Of Having A Long-Distance Best Friend

The best kind of long-distance relationship.
273681
views

Sometimes, people get annoyed when girls refer to multiple people as their "best friend," but they don't understand. We have different types of best friends. There's the going out together best friend, the see each other everyday best friend and the constant, low maintenance best friend.

While I'm lucky enough to have two out of the three at the same school as me, my "low maintenance" best friend goes to college six hours from Baton Rouge.

This type of friend is special because no matter how long you go without talking or seeing each other, you're always insanely close. Even though I miss her daily, having a long-distance best friend has its perks. Here are just a few of them...

1. Getting to see each other is a special event.

Sometimes when you see someone all the time, you take that person and their friendship for granted. When you don't get to see one of your favorite people very often, the times when you're together are truly appreciated.

2. You always have someone to give unbiased advice.

This person knows you best, but they probably don't know the people you're telling them about, so they can give you better advice than anyone else.

3. You always have someone to text and FaceTime.

While there may be hundreds of miles between you, they're also just a phone call away. You know they'll always be there for you even when they can't physically be there.

4. You can plan fun trips to visit each other.

When you can visit each other, you get to meet the people you've heard so much about and experience all the places they love. You get to have your own college experience and, sometimes, theirs, too.

5. You know they will always be a part of your life.

If you can survive going to school in different states, you've both proven that your friendship will last forever. You both care enough to make time for the other in the midst of exams, social events, and homework.

The long-distance best friend is a forever friend. While I wish I could see mine more, I wouldn't trade her for anything.

Cover Image Credit: Just For Laughs-Chicago

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

A Florida House Committee Is Undermining Your Vote On Amendment 4

Before felons can regain their right to vote, they must pay court fines, fees, and take care of any other "financial obligations." Essentially, this is a poll tax.

291
views

Amendment 4, also known as the Voting Rights Restoration for Felons Initiative, was added to the Constitution of Florida after being passed this last midterm election on November 6, 2018.

Amendment 4 restored the voting rights of Floridians with prior felony convictions after all terms of their sentence have been met, including parole and probation. This amendment only applies to felons who have not been convicted of murder or sexual offenses.

On January 8, 2019, an estimated 1.4 million ex-felons regained their right to vote. This is monumental. Prior to this amendment, Florida was one of four states that used felony disenfranchisement. Amendment 4 gives voice, and rightfully so, to felons who have served their time. Amendment 4 is also putting to rest, finally, years and years of disenfranchisement and suppression.

Now, only two months after its passage, the House Criminal Justice Committee is trying to water down this piece of legislation. This is a direct violation of the will of the 64% of Floridians who voted for the legislation as is. This amendment was not to be "clarified," as Governor DeSantis put it, but rather to be self-implementing.

However, the House Criminal Justice Committee proposed a bill that would tack on some extra qualifiers in order for felons to be enfranchised. The bill will require court fines, fees, and other "financial obligations" (in addition to fees administered in a judge's sentence) to be paid in full before a felon's voting rights are restored. This seems awfully similar to a poll tax to me. Obviously, this is going to affect people without a lot of resources rather than white-collar criminals who can afford a $500,000 bond.

This new qualifier will prevent felons from voting based on the money that can be coughed up as if they don't have to worry about their finances long after they leave prison.

Some may argue that these felons shouldn't have committed a crime in the first place. However, I would argue that holding a felon's vote hostage on the basis of money is unconstitutional.

Related Content

Facebook Comments