Why 2019's Doomsday Clock Statement is Far From Accurate

Why 2019's "Doomsday Clock" Statement is Far From Accurate

Our time-frame until "apocalypse" has been reported for the year, and things sound dire. However, following logic and optimism, one can clearly see the fault and inaccuracy within these claims.


Rather than work on my short fiction, "Burn," this week, I couldn't resist writing my thoughts on this topic.

The Bulletin of Atomic Scientists has released their statement for the "Doomsday Clock" of 2019, saying that we're "two minutes from midnight; the closest we've been to an apocalypse."

To say that this timeframe is selectively pessimistic would be a grotesque understatement.

In summary, the article presents the idea that the world is only a short time away from completely destroying itself. Rather than looking at the amazing innovations mankind has made and is working to make, it covers only the dark sides of our past and present, along with its unrealistic predictions for our future. Its coverage of "continuing worrisome nuclear trends" completely contradicts what's happening globally, and references the breaking of treaties as an indication of imminent nuclear fallout. One of the more ridiculous claims is its argument of the danger of our relationship with North Korea, while as of late, President Trump has spoken on his strong relationship with Kim Jong Un and the country itself; meeting with the leader more than once during his presidency. One possible reason for the dissolving of nuclear treaties, which is a major concern of the authors, could simply due to their old and outdated regulations, which may not apply to today's new and improved nuclear technologies. The world certainly isn't going to turn into a nuclear wild west, where countries drop bombs left and right just because there's no regulation. The world seems to understand the results of nuclear fallout clearly and hasn't seen its power since 1945. It seems that there's no need to worry on this front.

The threat of climate change does seem to be a bit more realistic, while still pessimistic. The abandonment of the Paris Climate Accords by the Trump Administration may not be ideal for our nation or the rest of the 196 countries in the said accords, but it still isn't even detrimental, let alone apocalyptic. The Trump Administration is bringing working-class jobs back to the United States, boosting the value of our dollar and of our middle class. The President and Congress are both hard at work to construct a new set of policies to keep our corporations and industries regulated. While leaving the Paris Accords may not have been a grand idea, who knows who will be Commander-in-Chief after Trump's term ends, possibly as early as 2021. A new president, or possibly even Trump, could replace the U.S. in the Paris Accords.

The article also covers the destructive effects of cyber-crime and cyber-war on our planet and its citizens. While advances in technology do provide some new avenues for hacking, disruption, and damage to our society in certain cases, it almost seems that the "Doomsday Clock" completely avoids how beneficial our new renaissance of technology has been to the entire world. As technology evolves, so will the securities that accompany it. It's similar to the dangers of driving a car. While that may be true, the car has security measures to protect you while you are enjoying the ride. The benefits of traveling in a car outweigh the dangers. And, should you crash, the entire driving community of the world isn't going to park forever because you got t-boned. Life goes on and people keep driving. The same could be said for the planet, and to think that a few small (and preventable) attacks are grounds for getting rid of some of our most valuable and adaptable technologies is absurd.

This article, in the end, is vexatious. The way that it consciously avoids coverage of the benefits and breakthroughs we've made in recent history leads their entire argument down the rabbit-hole of fictitious exaggeration. The creators cherrypick their data carefully while avoiding any positive revelations or solutions our world has made to keep us from avoiding the apocalypse. While mankind has made many mistakes over our thousands of generations, we are far from stupid. We should be confident in our ability to find solutions to most of the problems we've created and problems that face us naturally. I would argue that the metaphorical countdown to our demise will rewind as we advance. Our dangers of extinction lie far back in our history when humanity fought with sticks and stones in loincloths. While we shouldn't rule out the dangers of our world, we should look for solutions, which is the survivalist essence of the human spirit. Let the pessimists have their doomsday clock. The optimists of the world will continue to dominate in innovation and creativity with unprecedented success.

We've made it this far; we aren't going anywhere for a long, long time.

Popular Right Now

8 Types Of People Fetuses Grow Into That 'Pro-Lifers' Don't Give 2.5 Shits About

It is easy to fight for the life of someone who isn't born, and then forget that you wanted them to be alive when you decide to hate their existence.


For those in support of the #AbortionBans happening all over the United States, please remember that the unborn will not always be a fetus — he or she may grow up to be just another person whose existence you don't support.

The fetus may grow up to be transgender — they may wear clothes you deem "not for them" and identify in a way you don't agree with, and their life will mean nothing to you when you call them a mentally unstable perv for trying to use the bathroom.

The fetus may grow up to be gay — they may find happiness and love in the arms of someone of the same gender, and their life will mean nothing to you when you call them "vile" and shield your children's eyes when they kiss their partner.

The fetus may grow up and go to school — to get shot by someone carrying a gun they should have never been able to acquire, and their life will mean nothing to you when your right to bear arms is on the line.

The fetus may be black — they may wear baggy pants and "look like a thug", and their life will mean nothing to you when you defend the police officer who had no reason to shoot.

The fetus may grow up to be a criminal — he might live on death row for a heinous crime, and his life will mean nothing to you when you fight for the use of lethal injection to end it.

The fetus may end up poor — living off of a minimum wage job and food stamps to survive, and their life will mean nothing to you when they ask for assistance and you call them a "freeloader" and refuse.

The fetus may end up addicted to drugs — an experimentation gone wrong that has led to a lifetime of getting high and their life will mean nothing to you when you see a report that they OD'd and you make a fuss about the availability of Narcan.

The fetus may one day need an abortion — from trauma or simply not being ready, and her life will mean nothing to you as you wave "murderer" and "God hates you" signs as she walks into the office for the procedure.

* * *

Do not tell me that you are pro-life when all of the above people could lose their lives in any way OUTSIDE of abortion and you wouldn't give 2.5 shits.

You fight for the baby to be born, but if he or she is gay or trans, you will berate them for who they are or not support them for who they love.

You fight for the baby to be born, but if he or she is poor or addicted, you will refuse the help they desperately need or consider their death a betterment of society.

You fight for the baby to be born, but when the used-to-be-classroom-of-fetuses is shot, you care more about your access to firearms than their lives.

It is easy to pretend you care about someone before they are even born, and easy to forget their birth was something you fought for when they are anything other than what you consider an ideal person.

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

For My Friend Who Made Me Feel Like A Burden When My Mental Health Was Deteriorating

And to a hypocritical ex-friend.


Dear Jessie,

I really thought you were my best friend in high school.

We spent a lot of time together at school and outside of school, getting into deep conversations and bonding. We'd go shopping on the weekends or chill at your house and paint and watch "Friends".

But apparently, I was wrong about you.

You cut me off as a friend freshmen year of college for no reason.

You judged me based on someone else's opinion, decision, and experience. And I wasn't even in the wrong. Adam was my boyfriend before Sierra's, and she was dating someone else anyway.

Apparently, you also spoke badly about me behind my back and had the audacity to say that I talked badly about you behind your back, when I didn't. I think the only bad thing I said was that your little sister was annoying, which you also said yourself.

I never talked badly about your religious beliefs, and whoever you heard that from was wrong. And I'm 95% sure it was Jacquie who told you or started that rumor. Come on, she tried to break you and Sierra's friendship, and everyone's friendships, because she was a petty, jealous brat and you know that!

Honestly, I think all of this was just an excuse to get rid of me and our friendship. And I think you especially did this because my mental health wasn't so great. I was depressed a lot and you treated me and my condition like a burden.

Which wasn't fair; you had depression and anxiety and I was always there for you. Never once did I treat you like a burden.

You made me out to be the bad guy Jessie. You refused to admit your own mistakes, and instead falsely pointed the finger at me.

And for that, I will never forgive you.

Related Content

Facebook Comments