Curtain Call Of The MCU
Start writing a post

Curtain Call Of The MCU

While Marvel is no where near done with its' projects, the upcoming films will be the possible last for several fan favorites.

Curtain Call Of The MCU

For a while, the concept of comic book movies was thought to be ridiculous. They were targeted at a small niche audience, not given much of a budget, and went under the radar. A lot of them were flops (Howard the Duck, The Hulk, Spawn) or just not well received (Watchmen, Sin City). Sure, there were good gems out of the bunch, like Spider-Man 1 and 2 or the Nolan Batman films, but it was still a very small draw compared to other relative franchises. Then came 2008 with the release of Iron Man, and the cinematic world forever shifted onto its back.

Bringing in then possible-box office risk Robert Downey Jr to portray Tony Stark/Iron Man, who at the time was considered a B-list hero at best, Marvel brought about a cinematic renaissance for comic fans and regular consumers alike. They began an experiment that has grown into a complete universe, spanning 3 phases of movies, streaming series, tie-in comics, short films, and television series. As of 2018, we will all have been going to Marvel movies for a decade. We've seen massive successes (The Avengers), a few misses that still made it out fine (Thor 2, Iron Man 3), and some oddball films and characters that instantly became classics (Guardians of the Galaxy, Ant Man). We had the entirety of Marvel merging with Disney to create a media powerhouse, and got some of the best content that Netflix has ever put out (even if Iron Fist is the black sheep of the Netflix series). We have different television series that compel us to feel for characters that work behind the scenes of the big guys (Agents of Shield and soon to release Cloak and Dagger), and have gotten to see so many different aspects of this wonderful universe with each project. And now, after almost a decade of releases, the first big plan of the MCU is going to come to an end.

With the oncoming appearance of Thanos (played by Josh Brolin) in the next Avengers film (which is split into 2 parts), the "BIGGEST BAD OF THEM ALL" will finally become a legitimate villain, instead of talking menacingly and riding a floating chair in the subplots of other films. This is a story that has taken 10 years to develop, and will possibly tie in EVERYTHING. And while this is HUGE for fans of the MCU, this is also a curtain call.

For the past 10 years, we've had a specific set of those who we'd call "The First Phasers." Unfortunately, after the final 2 film deal with Thanos, many of the actors who we've followed since their arrival into this universe and grown so attached to will have one of two choices: Stick around for cameos and a few more films, but not be heavily involved, or call it a day and move on to other projects. Chris Evans, who portrays Captain America, has flip flopped between wanting to stay and leave the MCU, as he wants to put his directing talents to use in other projects. And if the comics are to be believed and followed, Cap's shield and mantle do have a tendency to move around.

The final 2 films for this phase will be amazing and heartbreaking at the same time. Here is this world that we've turned to watch for a decade, staying after credits for bonus content, going over every frame trying to spot Stan Lee in his infamous cameos, and spending hours debating what each Easter egg means or ties into. By no means is the MCU over. We still have plenty of characters and upcoming projects to attend. But for all of us, it will be a swan song, as some of our favorites say goodbye or step back to let the next phase get to work. But always remember, in the comics, no one stays gone for long.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Student Life

Social Media Or Soul Media

To the generation that cares way too much about affirmation.

Emma Smith
  • This semester I am taking the ever so famous class, Writing 101. Walking into it, I had heard the horror stories about each major assignment. I have to admit, it’s not a class that I am fond of. But, major assignment #2 got me thinking, we had to create a research question based off of a topic that we are interested in.

Two weeks prior, I watched a very interesting documentary on Netflix. Miss Representation was recommended to me by one of my friends and I have to say the topic is absolutely mind blowing. Social Media and Female Body Image. How Social Media makes girls see this unnatural perfection of ‘beauty’ that really doesn’t exist. But female body image isn’t the only thing affected by social media.

Keep Reading... Show less

Sex And The Church

A letter to fellow believers.

Amanda Hayes
  • I know many of you just read that title and thought it was scandalous to see something so “risque” in the same setting as something holy. Well guess what – sex is part of that. Everyone seems to think they are separate, which makes since because most people treat them as though they are complete polar opposites. Shall we think this through?

Who created the Church body? God. Who created the body? Also God. If we know God to be the creator of all things, we cannot leave sex out of that equation. God created sex, people! Praise Him! Like all great things, the world has twisted and perverted it. The world has stained it so badly that even many church congregations see it only as stained and keep quiet about that part of God’s word. Many people know that God told Adam and Eve to “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28), but a lot of people overlook the entirety of Song of Solomon. The entire book is dedicated to telling of the love and sex between man and wife. God blessed us with the gift of intimacy, one to be shared between husband and wife. Church if we teach of sex as the blessing that it is, more people will start treating it as such. If we stop viewing sex as this unspeakable act, the temptation would be lessened. With the fall of man, humans naturally desire things they should not have. So if more people speak of it with gladness and praise, and do not hide it in the darkness as if it were vile, fewer people would be drawn to it for the wrong reasons. More people would appreciate it for what it is: a gift from God.

Keep Reading... Show less

Chick-fil-A, I love you.

Keep Reading... Show less

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

Is God Reckless?

First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments