Candace Owens And Ben Shapiro Attack Harry Styles' Vogue Dress
Start writing a post

No, Candace Owens And Ben Shapiro, Harry Style's Dress Is NOT A Marxist Plot To Destroy Manhood

A pop star wearing a dress on the cover of Vogue is actually not a Marxist plot to destroy men.

No, Candace Owens And Ben Shapiro, Harry Style's Dress Is NOT A Marxist Plot To Destroy Manhood

With the president of the United States refusing to concede that he lost an election and the COVID-19 pandemic rapidly worsening, conservative commentators Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro took time out of their busy schedules to address the most pressing concern facing the world right now: Harry Styles' Vogue photoshoot.

Owens and Shapiro were promptly laughed at by just about everyone on Twitter for this take, and rightly so — it's ridiculous. But their views on gender and clothing are more prevalent than the online reaction reflects, so let's talk about them.

In his attempted "gotcha liberals" Twitter thread, Ben Shapiro tried to argue that the fact that Harry Styles was celebrated for his Vogue cover proves that its point was to "feminize masculinity." So let's make a couple of things clear. People celebrated Harry Styles for his Vogue shoot first and foremost because he looked good in it. He's wearing high fashion on the cover of a fashion magazine. For most people, myself included, the pictures just were not that deep. The clothes were cool. The photos were nice. That was about it.

But (as much as I hate to admit it), Shapiro does have a point that some of the attention directed at the photoshoot was because it subverted gender roles.

Where he's wrong is that this was some covert ploy to "feminize masculinity."

A man wearing a dress on a cover of a magazine is, even in 2020, still a subversion of traditional gender roles (although someone might want to tell Candace Owens and Ben Shapiro that male pop stars have worn dresses before — they seem a little too shocked right now). But people aren't celebrating the Vogue shoot because it's "feminizing masculinity." The point of subverting archaic gender roles isn't to make men "more like women" (or, vice versa, to make women more like men).

The point is that it's ridiculous to judge someone's worth as a man by something as trivial as clothing.

When Candace Owens says that "society can't survive without strong men," she's clearly saying that she doesn't think a man can both be strong and wear a dress. Subversion of gender roles in fashion points out how ridiculous of a statement that is. How strong could someone possibly be if all it takes to make them weak is a piece of fabric in a certain shape? If anything, isn't it stronger to have the confidence to wear clothing that you know people like Candace Owens will ridicule you for? Doesn't that show more confidence and strength of character?

If all it takes to make men "weak" is for them to look fantastic in a dress, then they were never that strong to begin with.

I'm not saying this to try and set up Harry Styles as some kind of pioneer of gender-neutral fashion. The very Vogue tweet Candace quote-tweeted quotes him as saying that he's never "thought too much" about what his clothes mean. And that's the point. It's not a ploy by the "Marxists" to ruin masculinity (and I'm more than a little tired of commentators like Owens trying to instigate a third Red Scare with this ridiculous narrative). It's divorcing our ideas of what being a man (or a woman) from something as inconsequential as clothing.

I'm far from the first person to point out that Candace Owens spends a lot of time wearing a suit. A couple of decades ago, that would have been as unacceptable as the Vogue photoshoot about which she's currently up in arms. I'm sure Candace doesn't think her clothing makes her "less of a woman," because it so obviously doesn't. It does, however, show that she's clearly on the wrong side of history and almost impressively un-self-aware about it.

Report this Content

Candace Owens' Backwards Ideas Are Causing Damage, Not Harry Styles Wearing A Dress

Candace Owens thinks men wearing dresses are damaging to civilization, but it's her ideas that are the problem.


Androgyny is something that has always been part of culture. Since the beginning of time, gender expression has always been varied and expansive. However, as time went on, society forced particular roles onto certain genders. These sorts of gender roles have caused many to rebel against them, including artists and rock stars. Harry Styles seems to be the next one in line to rebel in this way.

Keep Reading... Show less

​If You Have An Issue With Harry Styles Wearing A Dress, This Is For You

Harry Styles, the first male to appear solo on the cover of Vogue in American history should be something celebrated, not denounced.


Harry Styles has consistently been catapulted into stardom for countless reasons such as, but not limited to: being an amazing artist and an all-around phenomenal human to admire. Renowned for leading his platform through kindness, acceptance, love, and self-expression. It is not a secret to anyone that follows Harry Styles that he upholds an eccentric sense of fashion. Harry Styles is a mogul for shifting the traditional gender fashion roles towards a more gender-neutral normative fashion. He leads this by rocking whatever fashion he wishes to express himself in and extending the same acceptance and kindness to others.

Keep Reading... Show less

Native Americans Might Have Been The Key To Turning Arizona Blue

Voter turnout hit records in this year's election, and it may have been the secret weapon for the Democrats.


The 2020 general election brought in more participants and voters than ever before, and in Arizona, an important chunk of the registered voter turnout was the Native community.

Keep Reading... Show less

Being An Arizona Voter And Using Mail-In Ballots

Arizona uses secure technology and reliable machines to count ballots for the 2020 general election.


Arizona has more mail-in ballots to count this year due to the coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic. With the state's experience and partners, voters can rely on faster results and secure counting.

Keep Reading... Show less

Arizona Voters Pass Prop. 208 To Support Education Funding With New Taxes

Arizona voters pass Prop. 208, an initiative that will bring more money to Arizona schools.


Called by the Associated Press Thursday, Arizona's Proposition 208, also known as the Invest in Education Act, has passed. This proposition will place a 3.5% tax surcharge on any income above $250,000 for individuals and $500,000 for couples.

Keep Reading... Show less

This morning, Pfizer released fantastic news about their COVID-19 vaccine.

Keep Reading... Show less
Facebook Comments