The Dangers Of Idolizing Politicians, Regardless Of Ideology
I can celebrate Donald Trump leaving office, but I will not celebrate a Biden-Harris administration.
This past Saturday, major news outlets projected that Joe Biden would win the 2020 presidential election. The news sparked immediate celebration of Donald Trump's impending departure from the White House. The results of this election were also momentous to many for another reason: a Biden administration also means that Kamala Harris will be the first woman and person of color to become vice president of the United States.
I understand how monumental it is to finally see a woman of color in the office of vice president — as a woman of color myself, it's something that I've also been anticipating in the past. However, I also have to recognize that we can't just celebrate Kamala Harris because she's a woman or a person of color. Unfortunately, politics and politicians just aren't that simple. I've found it increasingly concerning to see Kamala Harris being painted as Lady Liberty, photoshopped onto the body of the goddess Durga, or pushed into the already questionable #GirlBoss category.
As much as I would love to be able to just celebrate Black and South Asian American representation in the White House, I've found this idolization of politicians, especially Kamala Harris and even Joe Biden in some cases, increasingly concerning.
Neither Joe Biden nor Kamala Harris have particularly good track records. Even if we just look at their individual impacts on communities of color, their past actions and policies aren't exactly very promising. One of the more prominent criticisms of Joe Biden is his role in authoring the 1994 Crime Bill, which helped to exacerbate the war on drugs. The bill most notably caused harm in communities of color in its funding of new prisons, its imposition of stricter punitive measures and prison sentences, and its encouragement of more drug-related arrests.
Meanwhile, Kamala Harris' career as a prosecutor and attorney general included the incarceration of Black and brown people in vulnerable communities. From marijuana-related arrests under Harris to her truancy law that disproportionately affected Black parents in low-income households, Harris' record isn't exactly one to be celebrated either.
With both Biden's and Harris' political careers in mind, it's been especially confusing for me to see the same people who were calling for the defunding of police departments — Biden, by the way, has made it clear that he does not support defunding the police — and an end to mass incarceration in the summer now celebrating a Biden-Harris administration without any skepticism about what their administration will actually do to advance the interests of BIPOC, especially the Black community.
Of course, I understand that there's a possibility that both Biden and Harris have changed their ideals or values in some way, but that doesn't mean that we should blindly idolize them either. The real danger in this type of idolization without any room for criticism is that there's a reasonable chance that people simply won't pay as much attention to the actions of a Biden-Harris administration.
One thing I will say about the Trump administration was that people paid attention, people were more aware of the Trump administration's policies and were able to push back against the administration's actions. My concern, then, is that the transition back to a Democrat presidency might cause complacency among those who identify as Democrats. If people who were heavily critical of Trump before are now idolizing Biden and Harris, what are the chances that they will extend the same critical eye to a Biden-Harris administration? Even thinking back to the Obama administration, how many of these same people at the time paid attention to the administration's actions in the Middle East or its mass deportations? How many of these people still fail to recognize the failures of the Obama administration, and how many will be prone to overlooking the downfalls of a Biden-Harris administration?
When we idolize politicians like Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, we start to ignore their past actions, their past failures, and their potential to harm the same communities who supported them.
In short, I can celebrate Donald Trump leaving office, but I will not celebrate a Biden-Harris administration. As we make this transition in the presidency, we need to continue to be cautious of how we portray our political leaders. The narrative not too long ago was to "settle for Biden" — we can't just erase our criticisms of both Joe Biden and Kamala Harris, especially not after they take office. In idolizing these politicians, we risk becoming complacent, and we risk overlooking the potential negative impact of a Biden-Harris administration.
Yes, Democrats Should Split From Ilhan Omar And Her Brand Of Radicalism
Ilhan Omar's actions are only making matters worse for the Democrats and the country.
Many freshman representatives have been gaining a fair amount of traction recently, either by the things they say or the legislation they push. One of these is Congresswoman Ilhan Omar from Minnesota. However, the reasons for the attention she has garnered are more negative than positive.
Earlier in March, Ilhan Omar accused American Jews of "dual loyalty," an anti-Semitic trope that has been used many times throughout history. She proclaimed, "I want to talk about the political influence in this country that says that it is OK for people to push for allegiance to a foreign country." When Democrat Representative Nita Lowey called her out for such comments, Omar responded by saying, "I should not be expected to have allegiance/pledge support to a foreign country in order to serve my country in Congress."
Most recently, she has come under fire over her comments on the 9/11 terrorist attacks, referring to this horrific event as "some people did something." Here's the full quote:
She could have reasonably apologized for that comment, saying that she used a poor choice of words and did not really mean it. But instead, she doubled down. Omar tweeted a quote from George W. Bush that says, "The people — and the people who knocked these buildings down will hear all of us soon."
She then followed up in the same tweet asking, "was Bush downplaying the terrorist attack? What if he was a Muslim?"
Omar and her defenders say that she is being criticized because she is a person of color and for her Muslim faith. However, there are other Muslim and African-American Congress members who aren't under any scrutiny like her. They don't associate themselves with anti-Semitism and downplay terrorism like Ilhan Omar did.
Now, Omar and her companions are suggesting that a video Trump tweeted, juxtaposing her 9/11 comments with footage of the attack is inciting violence. When asked if she thinks Trump is trying to incite violence against Ilhan Omar, Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, responded by saying, "Absolutely." Omar replied to the video by saying, "Violent rhetoric and all forms of hate speech have no place in our society, much less from our country's Commander in Chief. We are all Americans. This is endangering lives. It has to stop."
Has Trump used violent rhetoric before? Yes, he has, but the video he tweeted about Ilhan Omar does not encourage any violence toward her. It is dishonest to say it does and is an attempt to stifle real discussion. The actual people sending Omar death threats and the people honestly criticizing her are two entirely different groups.
If Democrats want to have a chance for 2020, they need to split from the radical area of their party, and that includes Ilhan Omar.