Public Health Shouldn't Be Politicized

Protecting Public Health Should Not Be Such A Politicized Stance To Take

When American officials decide that they're above the need for personal protective equipment, the whole country loses.


By now, you know the drill: if you're going out to a public place, you should be wearing an assortment of personal protective items like a mask and gloves. You should be practicing social distancing and staying at least six feet away from the person next to you unless you live together. You should be doing this every single time you leave your home, not because you want to make a bold statement for or against the ongoing crisis, but because you know that, even though it feels bizarre, it's the best thing for public health.

Despite the best intentions of many Americans to slow the spread of the coronavirus, there are a select few who feel that protecting the health of themselves and those around them is an encroachment on their individual liberties. Enter those members of society who are engaging in mass protests against social distancing guidelines, harassing (and even killing) workers who enforce new health policies, or blatantly refusing to wear any kind of personal protective equipment in public.

Included in this (small but vocal) population of American hypocrites is our fearless leader, President Donald Trump, and many officials from his administration. Trump has been spotted mask-less on a tour of a mask-manufacturing site, at a meeting with top military executives, and while speaking with a group of World War II veterans. Vice President Pence went so far as to forgo a mask on a tour of the Mayo Clinic and to encourage a group of food industry CEOs to remove their masks before a meeting in Iowa.

In a crisis as dire as this one, you'd think that federal officials would be jumping on the opportunity to encourage Americans to protect public health. Like it or not, they're figureheads of this country, and their actions have a significant impact on how citizens perceive acceptable behavior in uncertain times. In refusing to wear any sort of protective equipment in public, they send a clear message to their (already pretty polarized) constituents that masks are optional. Further, they affiliate themselves with the group of Americans who feel that federal health guidelines are too restrictive and, rather than promoting public health, are nothing but a severe breach of personal liberties.

Masks have quickly become a symbol of compliance with federal regulation, and this alignment has done the devastating job of bringing politics into the world of public health. People who may have at first been indifferent to masks and PPE are watching some of their leaders go about business as usual, and it makes them question whether or not the crisis at hand is being blown out of proportion by the media. The resulting counterculture, composed of those who refuse to acknowledge the severity of the situation at hand, has the potential to do a lot of damage on a very large scale.

In the words of every single email greeting you've received since mid-March: "We're living in unprecedented times." As Americans, we're being asked to do a lot of things we may find bizarre: wear masks and gloves, stay six feet away from others, go months at a time without seeing our loved ones in person. On top of this, we're watching our leaders, the people who are supposed to set an example for the entire country, brush off the severity of this crisis and go about their days as if nothing were different.

Let me assure you: everything is different. Politics has no business in public health, and your political affiliation should not determine whether or not you follow federal health regulations.

Wear a mask.

Keep your distance.

Ignore (or better yet, admonish) the people who so wrongly believe that they are above the scale of the COVID-19 pandemic.

The virus doesn't care about your political party, and at the end of the day, we all have the same amount of freedom and well-being to lose if we let this thing spiral anymore than it already has.

Report this Content

Harvard Just Announced Its 2020-21 School Year Will Be Taught Online — At Full $50K Tuition

While students attending degree-granting programs are set to pay the massive bill, Harvard still has widely available public courses that they offer for free.

Harvard University has announced that all classes for the 2020-2021 academic schedule will be held online. However, they will still be charging the typically more than $50,000 price tag to pay for tuition alone — a number that can inflate to more than $70,000 when additional costs are added together.

Keep Reading... Show less

ICE To International Students With Remote Fall Classes: Transfer Or Face Deportation

The new rule aims to pressure universities into holding in-person classes this fall.

In a news release on Monday, ICE announced that "The U.S. Department of State will not issue visas to students enrolled in schools and/or programs that are fully online for the fall semester nor will U.S. Customs and Border Protection permit these students to enter the United States."

Keep Reading... Show less

Elijah McClain's Case Is Being Reopened — His Family Is Still Waiting For Justice

The killing of an innocent Black man will be reinvestigated, and that news that brought me to tears.

9News / YouTube

On August 24, 2019, in Aurora, CO, a 23-year-old Black man named Elijah McClain was walking home from a convenience store after buying iced tea for his brother. He was wearing a ski mask because he was anemic and easily got cold. He was listening to music and dancing while he walked when someone called 911 on this Black man simply walking home.

Keep Reading... Show less

Despite COVID-19, Alabamans Return To Beaches

Noncompliance with CDC recommendations on beaches may contribute to outbreaks in Republican-controlled states.

Last week, I was in Orange Beach, AL. It, along with other Alabama beaches, seems to be quickly becoming a hotspot for coronavirus (COVID-19) cases, yet one could not discern this by observing the behavior of beachgoers. The situation on the ground was absolutely bonkers, and no one seemed to even be aware of the ongoing pandemic. Several restaurants that my family and I frequently visit on our annual trips to the beach had closed their doors this year due to an employee or employees contracting the virus. But at the ones that remained open, people neither wore masks nor maintained social distance.

Keep Reading... Show less

Trump's Tax Returns May Finally Be Investigated After A 7-2 Supreme Court Ruling

Both justices the president appointed ruled against him.

In a ruling on Thursday morning, the majority of the Supreme Court concluded that President Donald Trump is not immune to grand jury subpoenas.

Keep Reading... Show less

The Supreme Court Just Said Employers Can Deny Covering Birth Control, And It Wasn't Even A Close Vote

"Today, for the first time, the Court casts totally aside countervailing rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree..." — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

The Supreme Court today ruled in line with the Trump Administration that your employer or university can deny covering birth control based on "religious or moral objection."

Keep Reading... Show less

A Vote For ANYONE Other Than Biden Is A Vote Against Someone You Love

We cannot afford a repeat of 2016’s botched election right now.

On Saturday, Kanye West announced on Twitter that he would be running for president in the 2020 election. It is hard to tell for sure if he is joking and this is all a publicity stunt or if he is serious. People were quick to point out that he had already missed the deadline to officially add his name to many states' ballots for the general election. Regardless, voters are still legally allowed to write in Kanye's name on their ballot, and there's a possibility that many young voters will do so.

Keep Reading... Show less
Facebook Comments