How "UnREAL" were the 2016 Presidential Elections
Politics and Activism

How "UnREAL" were the 2016 Presidential Elections

The election coverage wasn't so different from the machinations of Rachel and Quinn on the Lifetime series UnREAL

How "UnREAL" were the 2016 Presidential Elections

A couple of weeks ago, I was introduced to UnREAL, an American drama television series that premiered on Lifetime on June 1st, 2015. The story is this: a young television producer is being pushed by her ambitious boss to to disregard integrity and fabricate prurient show content. This series gave us a glimpse into the world of reality television show creators and how they construct their stories. Interestingly, in the first episode, this behind the scenes team created a narrative, assigning identifiers to the different contestants on their show. Villain, hero, sidekick; which character was going to get most sympathy etc... Then I realized something. If Reality TV is as doctored as this show is, what makes me think that the political elections are any less manipulated.

The more I think about the election coverage and the way that the candidates were being presented to the world, the more I believe that an intentional narrative was created and fed to people. Hillary was the hero on the road to redemption. Trump was the infallible radical villain who alienates those politically, socially and economically impoverished. Bernie was the underdog ideal candidate; the one who would’ve probably been thrown under the bus as consequence of people’s ignorance and cynicism. The rest of the candidates acted as hero’s obstacles and remained a small part of the election story.

The candidates played into these rolls, embracing the implicit labels the media had placed on them. Remember however, these stories were created at the commencement of the election process. A binary narrative involving hero and villain was created the moment both candidates announced that they were running. Trump, a democrat until he decided to change his political affiliation to identify himself as republican, had never been as radically anti-human rights until the election started. Hillary, who was born to a republican family and claimed she was a moderate for many years before she ran for president, was never as liberal as she is right now. Being on the fence about things doesn’t get you the votes. This 2016 election functioned in absolutes; in order to win you needed to choose one side and commit.

This begs the question: with Trump as President, should we be as worried as we are right now? We must keep in mind however that he did desensitize a whole American populace from considering political, economic and sociological perspectives of the sexually, ethnically, racially and racially diverse people in this nation. Since his election, Trump has redacted many of his discriminatory actions (mostly because he probably realized he’s not in a position to do so because of his status as President Elect). He didn’t ruin the Iran deal. He removed his Muslim ban statement from his website. He refused to interfere with the Supreme Court’s decision on the Same-Sex Marriage Act. Of course, this can change at anytime considering his volatile personality. Bu if he doesn’t, was Trump just playing the role of the antagonist as a ploy to get elected? While Trump normalized discriminatory behavior, and desensitized the outrage of said citizens being discriminated, I realize that Trump cracked open the floor board on an already festering, discriminatory, institutional foundation. What he did was show the world that the sexist, homophobic, racist, xenophobic roots of America affects people in discreet nuanced ways that make half of the American citizens in the country believe that the other half doesn’t belong.

The media played an unscrupulous role in all of this too. There was limited coverage of every other candidate, as the news created focalized hegemony on the Trump/Hillary narrative. Media Tenor, a content analysis firm, said it best when it claimed that,

“Game-centered reporting has consequences. The media’s tendency to allocate coverage based on winning and losing affects voters’ decisions. The press’s attention to early winners, and its tendency to afford them more positive coverage than their competitors, is not designed to boost their chances, but that’s a predictable effect.

Bernie Sanders was consistently portrayed as the candidate that was “too good to be true: and was immediately given the cold shoulder by the media. He was deemed an impossibility for the future of America because he was “too good” and “optimistic” about the future. The media advertisers anesthetized people to optimistic realities. Instead of seeing hope in a morally good and consistent politician, people and the media dismissed him and decided to play into the stereotype of he corrupt politicians. Bernie Sanders was America’s “one that got away.”

Instead, with the repeated, bipartite coverage convinced people that was an either/or scenario. Hillary or Trump. What spurred my belief in this theory was the final advertisement for the presidential primaries that looked like a WWE commercial.

At first, I thought this was all speculation; a conspiracy theory about the evils of the media and how to manipulate public opinion. But, then I started doing research and came about narrative persuasive psychology, and narrative political communication, all studies that support my claim that this election was probably doctored by the media and that the candidates needed to take on these “good versus evil” personas in order to capture the attention of voters and get America involved in the election.

For instance, communication scholars W.L Bennett and M.Edelman who have studied the role that narrative plays in politics through news media claim that the story transmitted through mass media act as barriers to solving social problems by casting policy issues in simplistic, ideological terms.” It gets even more interested when both scholars in their article Towards a New Political Narrative published in the Journal of Communication discuss how “the power of narratives to label political participants as “heroes” or “villains” or “deserving” or “undeserving” create “public policies that are rationalized by the construction of social problems for which they become solutions””.

The Harmony Institute supported a study about how narrative is used to persuade and motivate. I believe that this also applies to how the media controlled the coverage around the elections. Whether or not Trump is a true republican, or Hillary a true Democrat, the audience was transported to identify both of those characters in the developing narratives as binary to each other. Trump, deciding to take a radical stance on many issues he didn’t have a problem with in the past, became the villain of the story, inducing strong emotions from the American public.

The way that he did so was by making sure he repeated his discriminatory lines, and even made them explicitly derogatory. “Bad Hombres,” “Grab them by the p****,” “Dangerous Muslims,” and so on. By doing that, he increased audience interest by exposing the flaky and institutionalized inequity in the foundations of the United States, eliciting empathy for those who had felt attacked, and motivated people to take action against him. After conducting their own research Academics Denis Pare, Dawn R. Collins and Joe Guillaume Pelletier state that By combining science with the art of storytelling, we can produce strategies that encourage engagement, empathy, and action...The increase in negative sentiment positively correlated with an increase in issue interest (LaMarre & Landreville 2009)...Besides arousing interest in an issue, inducing negative emotions may also increase empathy within audience members…” supporting the Harmony Institute diagram, and my argument as well.

As scary as this media narrative tampering is, the argument is able to stand. It was created in a very similar way to the story timeline created by the protagonist on the Lifetime series UnREAL. The machination behind the narrative, the premeditated outcome, the establishing of a solid hero’s journey narrative all at the cost of a country’s divide. Perhaps our desire to be led by story will spur your intellectual downfall. Only time will tell.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.

Being a pharmacy technician never held as many risks as it does now. Exposure too hazardous conditions were little to none, and garbing up was only conducted in IV compounding. But, now, in order to give nurses the medications they need to help their patients, they need us, pharmacy technicians.

Keep Reading... Show less

I've always been a huge Disney villain fan — whether it was for their cryptic one-liners, enviable outfits, or sidekick banter. Some of the most iconic lines from cinematic history have been said by the characters we love to hate and occasionally dress up as once a year.

The fear-mongering Gaston I now find hilariously cringe-worthy is now charming and oftentimes considered by fans as rightfully justified in his actions. Die-hard fans of the Disney villain fan club claim alternate egos in their favorite evil characters, adopting their hilarious witticisms into everyday life.

Keep Reading... Show less

Social media is something many of us have been addicted to (whether we want to believe it or not) since the moment we got it. I remember getting Facebook at 10. Instantly I was hooked. I loved being able to share my life with people, a little too much in my opinion, and I loved being able to see how/what other people were doing all the time.

Keep Reading... Show less

I have always felt left out because of how I look and who I am. I have always felt like the elephant in the room, literally. I have always been shamed for my size. For the longest time, I cared so much about what I wear and who I wore certain things in front of. I never wanted to wear shirts that would show a lot of my arm, located above my elbow. I wouldn't wear shorts that didn't go to the tip of my knees, at least. I never wore anything remotely tight, where you could see every curve, roll, or imperfection. I was so insecure about myself, and not many of my friends knew.

Keep Reading... Show less

I have definitely had my fair share of breakups. I broke up with my high school sweetheart my second semester of college (he was cheating on me), I had a breakup with another guy I thought I was going to marry, and others in between. Regardless of whether you're the one doing the dumping or being dumped, breakups can HURT.

Keep Reading... Show less

-Having struggled with acne prone skin for years, I was cautious to try a new serum on top of the other products I've come to trust.

Keep Reading... Show less
Health and Wellness

Your Social Activism May Actually Benefit From A Cleansing Social Media Detox

In the craziest year of our lives, sometimes there's value in taking a break.

We are living through, unequivocally, one of the most dangerous, unstable, chaotic periods of any of our lives. From COVID-19 to crises of police brutality to the mass exploitation of the poor by mega-corporations, the world outside seems to be looking more dystopic every day. What can be done about it? For many, activism involves heavily posting on social media to keep others aware. However, this comes with a net negative cost — increased levels of anxiety, depression, and hopelessness about the state of the world. Why might this be? After all, in past eras activists have endured comparable and greater levels of abuse and relentless torment from oppressors. Why, now, are people getting so easily burnt out?

Keep Reading... Show less

Reading is a relaxing activity that provides many benefits. Everybody reads books (when they are not watching Netflix, chatting on social media, or making Tik Tok videos) to distract themselves from reality for a while. Many do not realize the positive impact that books have like reducing stress, assisting with sleep, improving cognitively, and strengthening the mind. In honor of National Book Day, there are many great novels that you can read to mark this special holiday. Here are the best ones to check out.

Keep Reading... Show less

I Asked My Boyfriend His Opinion On Liking Other Girls’ Pictures, And, Spoiler Alert, It's Cheating

"When you get into a relationship and you're in love, you have to realize that liking photos is for the single lifestyle."

Ladies, listen up. If you are in a relationship with a guy and he is liking other girls' pictures on social media, then it's a red flag. A man who can look at someone else and show interest by liking it means he doesn't care about your feelings AT ALL.

Keep Reading... Show less

5 Things You Need To Know Before You Watch 'Arrested Development' On Netflix

"Her?" Yes, she's an amazing show! (You'll get this joke after you watch the show).


"Arrested Development" is an award-winning sitcom that aired for three seasons on Fox beginning in 2003, and then was picked up by Netflix for a fourth season in 2013, and then again for a final season in 2018.

However, it seems to remain one of the world's most underrated and under-appreciated shows of all time. Although this article alone won't be enough to skyrocket the show to Netflix's top 10, I hope that it will open people's eyes to the value and quality of the show.

Keep Reading... Show less
Facebook Comments