Your 'Gun-Free Zones' Are Causing More Deaths Than Any Pro-Gun Law

Your 'Gun-Free Zones' Are Causing More Deaths Than Any Pro-Gun Law

Look where most mass shootings happen.


I was out with my boyfriend this weekend when I got a news update from CNN about the tragic shooting in Pittsburg. As someone who is religious myself, it terrified me to think that one of the places I go to feel safe could be brought down by gun violence. But it also got me thinking one thing that I couldn't shake.

Gun-free zones are basically just giant glowing targets for anybody who wants to commit a mass murder.

Hear me out. Guns used to scare me and I was all for stricter laws so they didn't get into the hands of the wrong people. Being from Chicago, who has some of the strictest gun laws yet worst gun violence rates in the country, I began to see the flaws in this logic.

According to the Crime Prevention Research Center, 97.5% of shootings happen in gun-free zones. Let that sink in for a moment.

Fast forward a few years to a party that my boyfriend, a firefighter, and I attended with his friends, the majority of which are firefighters as well. We were about to have a water balloon war and it shocked me how many guys lifted up their shirts to remove guns from their waistbands. Instead of the uneasy feeling I thought I would have, it honestly made me feel safer.

Anybody who wants to carry out a mass shooting will do it, and they will do it in a place where they know nobody will shoot back: gun-free zones. Think about it. Where have all of the most recent mass shootings taken place? Sandy Hook. Parkland. Vegas. Now the Tree of Life synagogue. These were all gun-free zones.

The sad truth is that somebody can cause you a whole lot more damage when you have to rely solely on the police to protect you. They never get there before at least a dozen people die and that isn't their fault. It is just reality.

You may be thinking, "But then why do we never hear of other people with guns stopping shootings?" Because it is not part of the mass media's agenda. It happens more frequently than you may think, like in this attempted robbery stopped by an armed customer, or these heroes who didn't let a gunman get away after attempting to shoot up a restaurant.

In this era of mass shootings, gun-free zones should no longer be a thing.

All these zones do are give shooters a target. A target that they know is unarmed, unprotected and unknowing because they think they are in a safe place.

No, I'm not saying we should arm every teacher and priest. That would be nuts. But if my campus wasn't a gun-free zone, my handgun would be in my backpack at all times. Why? Because who is going to mess with the girl who has a gun? Nobody. Just like who is going to mess around and try a mass shooting in a place where someone might have a gun? Nobody smart and nobody who will get very far with it.

We look at guns as the enemy when they are a form of protection that we need to be using. The Founding Fathers knew it, the Republicans know it, and we need to know it too.

Your gun-free zones won't stop mass shootings. Those of us with the concealed carry permits and handguns in our waistbands will.

Popular Right Now

Mr. President, When You Come At John McCain, You Come At All Arizonans

Donald Trump told reporters the other day that he "was never a fan of John McCain" and "never will be."


As an Arizonan, John McCain is synonymous with courage, bravery, independence, and just being a good person. McCain was our Senator, serving for more than 30 years in the chamber. Before that, he was a congressman and served in the Navy for over 20 years. During his time in the military, he served in the Vietnam War and was captured by the North Vietnamese and was transported to the "Hanoi Hilton." He was a Prisoner of War for five-and-a-half years and was finally released in 1973.

John McCain sacrificed so much for his country, and how you can say you were "never a fan" of him is beyond me.

John McCain wasn't political all the time, he understood that politics don't make a person. People are more important than scoring political points.

On Tuesday, Trump doubled-down on his dislike of the political giant after his tweetstorm over the weekend. Trump was standing alongside the president of Brazil, who is considered the Trump of his country and South America. In 2017, McCain defied Trump and voted against the repeal of Obamacare. This still infuriates Trump to this day.

The very next day, Trump didn't let up on the late senator. He said, "I gave him the kind of funeral that he wanted, which as president I had to approve. I don't care about this. I didn't get thank you. That's OK. We sent him on the way, but I wasn't a fan of John McCain."


We understand that you don't like him, but keep it to yourself. You know there's a saying my mom taught me, "If you don't have anything nice to say don't say anything at all."

Trump's negativity toward McCain extends beyond 2017. In 2016, during the campaign, Trump said, "He's a war hero because he was captured. I like people that weren't captured." Mocking his time as a prisoner of war as if it were a choice.

Arizonans have regarded their former senator with so much respect.

After the tweetstorm from the president over the weekend, one of his daughters, Meghan McCain, said, "I just thought 'your life is spent on weekends not with your family, not with your friends but obsessing.' Obsessing over great men you could never live up to. That tells you everything you need to know about his pathetic life."

I cannot fathom how someone could still tweet that they are not a fan of someone even after their passing. Especially not from the President of the United States. No matter your political beliefs or views on policy, I think we need to take a step back and think, "Would this be acceptable if someone in my family said this?"

As an Arizonan, I know how much of an impact Senator McCain has made on not only this state but around the world. Presidents attended his funeral and world leaders sent their condolences to the McCain family. John McCain is a legend in American politics, and will never be replaced, not by anyone.

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

I Absolutely LOVE The Abortion Bill Oklahoma Has Passed

"Men controlling women"? Get over yourself.


"A pregnant woman seeking to abort her pregnancy shall be required to provide, in writing, the identity of the father of the fetus to the physician who is to perform or induce the abortion." The bill does include exceptions for cases of rape, incest, and when the mother's life is in danger or cases where the father of the fetus has died (and of course, there has to be proof of his death).

A woman HAS TO PROVIDE CONSENT OF THE FATHER in order to abort her pregnancy and I absolutely love this. People in my hometown and state-wide are obviously upset about this because a decent number of them are "pro-choice." They're claiming that this is just another way for "men to control women" and God forbid that gets in the way of their feminist, pro-choice agenda (and I'll address this unfathomable bullshit in a minute).

If you didn't notice already, I'm pro-life. I 100% agree with the bill, even the exceptions. I may be a pro-life Republican, but I'm also a decent human being. I'm sure pro-choice Democrats are either laughing or disgusted thus far, but let me tell you something.

There are other answers compared to killing something that you, or any other woman helped to create. One specifically is adoption. Before you make the cliche argument "Why would I place a child in such a terrible system when I could spare them the agony of a potentially terrible life?" (OR ANYTHING ALONG THOSE LINES), let me shed light on this.

Think of all the couples that desperately want children but have zero ability to have their own. Think about the families that would do anything to raise a child. While you, or any woman, is/are pregnant, there are plenty of adoption agencies that you can visit. You can look through hundreds-of-thousands of files, searching for an amazing family that you like. From there, you can sit through interviews and meet these families that are so. eager. to have a baby. If anything, think of how saddened and desperate Chandler and Monica were when they found out they couldn't have a baby. Instead of ripping away and literally killing a couple's chance of having a baby, give them yours.

A 9-10 month commitment isn't that big of a deal when you think in terms of granting happiness to someone for a LIFETIME. And considering that it's a felony homicide in Oklahoma now.

When you get an abortion, outside of the exceptions listed above, you're selfish. You're only thinking about yourself and the fact that you don't want to be a mom (and perhaps not financially stable--but we shall revisit the adoption topic). Well guess what? Someone is. Give them that chance. And if you're thinking I'm a hypocrite and wouldn't follow through with adopting a baby like I'm preaching right now, you're wrong. I would 100% adopt.

As for "men controlling women," get over yourself. Feminists rant about gender equality all the time and guess what? Think of how many women kept their babies even though their boyfriends, baby daddies, and maybe even fiances and husbands didn't want one. This is the same thing, but a gender reverse. I can think of many guys that wanted to be dads, but their girlfriends decided otherwise with no remorse for their feelings. If the father wants to keep the baby and be a dad, he deserves to fight for it.

It takes two to make a baby. The fathers of these unborn rays of sunshine deserve rights and, in Oklahoma, they just got it. You ladies want gender equality? You just got it. Quit the double standards. Quit your bitching.

Related Content

Facebook Comments