The Fate of the Furious
Start writing a post
Entertainment

The Fate of the Furious

Film Review by Francisco Olivera

13
The Fate of the Furious
www.comingsoon.net

The Fate of the Furious (2017)

Directed by F. Gary Gray

1 1/2 stars (out of 4)

Well, here is yet another movie from the Fast and Furious franchise, and it is definitely fast and furious. The previous one, Furious 7, brought heartfelt commitment from the cast and crew to exciting results, and 2001’s The Fast and the Furious (written by David Ayer, who also penned Training Day that same year) was a tough, action-fuelled film for adrenaline junkies. So with skilled director F. Gary Gray (director of Straight Outta Compton and Friday) on the reigns this time, how could it have gone so wrong?

For starters, this franchise has burned out faster than the wheels used on 2006’s The Fast and the Furious: Tokyo Drift. The problem is not that this is the eighth film of a well-loved film franchise, but the fact that so much is ridiculous and cliché heavy in this latest installment. The plot: A cyber terrorist, Cipher (a wasted Charlize Theron), blackmails tough guy Dominic Toretto (Vin Diesel) into working for her and turning his back on his “family”, which in this film series is as bad as committing a cardinal sin. Cipher plans on starting a nuclear war, which does not sit well with the team. Everyone except the late Paul Walker, who was written as having a vacation with his wife somewhere, is back to reprise each of their respective roles as Dominic’s partners. These include Dwayne “The Rock” Johnson as special agent Luke Hobbs, Michelle Rodriguez as former street racer Letty Ortiz, Tyrese Gibson as Roman Pierce, rap star Ludacris as mechanic Tej Parker, and a priceless Jason Statham as Deckard Shaw (the hilarious scenes he shares with The Rock are the best reason to see the film, as they show wonderful chemistry as actors). Also, veteran reggaeton artists, Don Omar and Tego Calderón, make blink-and-you-might-miss-it cameos as fellow members of Dom’s gang.

There are a few redeeming qualities to this film, although none for me to merit a recommendation. The aforementioned scenes with Dwayne Johnson and Jason Statham show these two action stars with great comedic timing and delivery. Also, the always-welcome Kurt Russell reprises his role as covert ops team leader Mr. Nobody (with dark shades and a devilish grin that makes him seem like he’s the only one in on this joke of a movie), and Scott Eastwood stars as Little Nobody, who is under Mr. Nobody’s wing as a training law enforcement agent. Plus, as mindless and excessively loud as they are, certain action scenes were done skillfully and smoothly. But, sadly, these qualities do not overcome the film’s mistakes.

I have no qualms with films that have no shred of intelligence and huge boosts of adrenaline and action. Alas, it would be wise to at least form a coherent plot that is easy to follow and doesn’t go into stupidity (a scene defying any evidence of logic shows the heroes chasing after the bad guys on a nuclear submarine across a frozen lake in Iceland. Go figure.) I was dreading this would be another reason to milk this cash cow of a film franchise, even if the director on the realms is the superb F. Gary Gray. Yes, this same man was the one who directed 2015’s brilliant N.W.A. biopic Straight Outta Compton and 1995’s stoner comedy Friday. I expected more from such a talented cast and crew, but I guess people need to put food on their tables, too.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
Student Life

Social Media Or Soul Media

To the generation that cares way too much about affirmation.

785
Emma Smith
  • This semester I am taking the ever so famous class, Writing 101. Walking into it, I had heard the horror stories about each major assignment. I have to admit, it’s not a class that I am fond of. But, major assignment #2 got me thinking, we had to create a research question based off of a topic that we are interested in.

Two weeks prior, I watched a very interesting documentary on Netflix. Miss Representation was recommended to me by one of my friends and I have to say the topic is absolutely mind blowing. Social Media and Female Body Image. How Social Media makes girls see this unnatural perfection of ‘beauty’ that really doesn’t exist. But female body image isn’t the only thing affected by social media.

Keep Reading... Show less
Featured

Sex And The Church

A letter to fellow believers.

2084
Amanda Hayes
  • I know many of you just read that title and thought it was scandalous to see something so “risque” in the same setting as something holy. Well guess what – sex is part of that. Everyone seems to think they are separate, which makes since because most people treat them as though they are complete polar opposites. Shall we think this through?

Who created the Church body? God. Who created the body? Also God. If we know God to be the creator of all things, we cannot leave sex out of that equation. God created sex, people! Praise Him! Like all great things, the world has twisted and perverted it. The world has stained it so badly that even many church congregations see it only as stained and keep quiet about that part of God’s word. Many people know that God told Adam and Eve to “be fruitful and multiply” (Genesis 1:28), but a lot of people overlook the entirety of Song of Solomon. The entire book is dedicated to telling of the love and sex between man and wife. God blessed us with the gift of intimacy, one to be shared between husband and wife. Church if we teach of sex as the blessing that it is, more people will start treating it as such. If we stop viewing sex as this unspeakable act, the temptation would be lessened. With the fall of man, humans naturally desire things they should not have. So if more people speak of it with gladness and praise, and do not hide it in the darkness as if it were vile, fewer people would be drawn to it for the wrong reasons. More people would appreciate it for what it is: a gift from God.

Keep Reading... Show less
Tumblr

Chick-fil-A, I love you.

Keep Reading... Show less
Featured

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

3049
An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less
Featured

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

3236
Is God Reckless?


First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.


Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments