I Read J.K. Rowling's Essay And Stand By Trans Rights
Start writing a post

I Read J.K. Rowling's Essay And Stand By Equality — Trans Women Are Women, And Trans Men Are Men

Her books only refer to women of color for tokenism purposes, at best.

I Read J.K. Rowling's Essay And Stand By Equality — Trans Women Are Women, And Trans Men Are Men

Earlier this week, the Harry Potter author wrote an essay to, for lack of better words, "justify" why people were targeting her with labels and accusations of being a "terf" or "transphobic." This has caused outrage within the Harry Potter fandom, and people are feeling uncomfortable declaring their interest in the series, unable to remove the author from art.

In her essay, JK Rowling stated that this was the worst generation to be a woman and she "feared bringing up her daughters" in it. Her eldest daughter, at 26, is the same age as I am, and I completely disagree. We are seeing CEO's that are women of color who are both starting their own businesses or heading Fortune 500's.

Her books only refer to women of color for tokenism purposes, at best.

By allowing them a space in the story, but not developing their characters it inadvertently states "I see you, but this is all I'm allotting you." She has also retroactively revealed additional "inclusive" subject matter such as Dumbledore's sexuality, and Hermione's race - but only once her own profits have not been impacted.

Had she stopped to consider, when originally writing the Harry Potter series, that she was advised to use a pseudonym as people, particularly boys, in the 90s would not want to read a book written by a woman. Over the last decade, a substantial amount of Young Adult book series have been authored by women who have not refrained from using their own names.

"Twilight," "Hunger Games," and "Divergent" are examples of these young adult female-authored series that have also created film franchises.

The reason she claimed this was the worst time to be a woman was due to the over-sexualization of females.

If that is true, then she is, once again, a part of the problem in the context of the new Fantastic Beasts and Where To Find Them movies, where Nagini is revealed to be an animagi of an attractive, scantily-clad, Korean woman.

Secondly, her statement and reasoning of not supporting a UK act of being able to apply for a gender-change certificate without wanting to undergo surgery is appalling. She seems to be educated in the differences between sex and gender, but in her essay continued to use them interchangeably.

Her reasoning stems from a fear that men will claim they're women, enter a ladies' room to dominate or enact depraved actions against women. This is one of the most debunked myths as research, unfortunately, shows that trans people are more likely to be victims in those kinds of situations.

Not to mention, people are also statistically more likely to be attacked by people they know personally.

Also, in "Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets," Harry and Ron (two cisgender boys) literally enter a girl's bathroom to perform illegal actions by brewing a dangerous and unsupervised potion at the age of 12.

She bases these fears of her own past trauma, but the fact that she is using her platform to spread misinformation and prejudice rather than educating herself, or seeking help and resources (which she can obviously afford) to cope with her past experiences is disappointing.

It's common knowledge, as an overwhelming amount research shows, that due to the themes and morals expressed in the books, that Harry Potter fans tend to be more liberal and accepting of minorities - including LGBTQ people. So to actively put down people who have given her money and want to continue to support her is also disheartening.

She also addresses another fear.

Since transgender awareness and activism is trending or being highlighted, it may influence kids to make what she might view as a "stupid decision." Unfortunately, the transgender community is still very much discriminated against, and a trending hashtag won't change that.

This likely leads to her fear of people who "de-transition", which is a heavily emphasized point in her essay. But what she fails to acknowledge is that this is not an emotionally, socially, psychologically, or financially lighthearted decision and people who are seriously considering transitioning would seek out support or resource groups — or at the very least, do their research and educate themselves about the matter via the Internet.

The tone of the essay she wrote sounds as if she is trying to moderate a situation that she has no stake in. I do not have a personal stake in this either, but I never tell others how they should or should not live their lives - especially regarding matters that don't concern me or my life.

Report this Content

Sex And The Church

A letter to fellow believers.

Amanda Hayes

I know many of you just read that title and thought it was scandalous to see something so “risque” in the same setting as something holy. Well guess what – sex is part of that. Everyone seems to think they are separate, which makes since because most people treat them as though they are complete polar opposites. Shall we think this through?

Keep Reading... Show less

Chick-fil-A, I love you.

Keep Reading... Show less

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

Is God Reckless?

First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.

Keep Reading... Show less
Student Life

10 Signs You Grew Up In A Small Town

Whether you admit it or not, that tiny town will always have your heart.

The Odyssey

1. You still talk to people that you went to elementary school with.

These are the people you grew up with and the people you graduated high school with. The faces you see in kindergarten are the same faces you’ll see for the rest of your life.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments