The Supreme Court Shouldn't Have Rejected Remington's Appeal
Currently

The Supreme Court Needs To Understand That Suing Gunmakers Won’t Bring Back The Dead

Gun rights are a national issue right now and the only way to address the issue is for cases to be heard by the Supreme Court.

259

For those who are not as familiar with this situation, the families of the Sandy Hook school shooting victims are fighting to sue Remington Arms, the manufacturer of the AR-15 rifle used in the shooting. After going back and forth between courts in Connecticut, the Connecticut Supreme Court ruled in favor of the parents, allowing them to proceed with the lawsuit. Remington filed an appeal with the United States Supreme Court, which was rejected on November 12, 2019.

The justices did not even provide reasoning as to why they will not hear the case. They just rejected it.

The families argue that Remington wrongfully marketed the gun, "knowingly [marketing] and [promoting] the Bushmaster XM15-E2S rifle for use in assaults against human beings." The families who lost their children are trying to prove the company created a gun that promoted the shooter to go kill as many people as he could and as fast as he could.

Remington's defense is that they are protected under the 2005 Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, which limits gunmakers' legal liability when such shootings occur. While there are exceptions, such as if the manufacturer violated a law in marketing, Remington argues they did not do so and they are protected under the law. While the events that occurred are extremely unfortunate, it appears that the families are attempting to receive some form of compensation for their lost children.

However, this will not bring their children back and it is certainly not justice, which our system aims to achieve.

Whether you are for or against the right to own guns, this is a Second Amendment issue that needs to be heard by the Supreme Court. Later this term, they will be hearing New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. City of New York, New York, in which members of the NY State Rifle & Pistol Association argue that the strict gun laws the city enforces guns only being able to be carried to and from shooting ranges with other strict regulations. While this is a good start for the Supreme Court, our nation needs them to hear Remington's defense and make a decision for the county with regards to the Second Amendment.

Report this Content
Politics and Activism

4 Ways The Plan To Deport International Students Is Dumb, According To An Exchange Student

The whole policy isn't very stay-in-place, if you ask me.

Wikimedia Commons

On Monday, July 6, new federal guidelines were announced that do not allow international students to remain in the U.S. unless they are taking classes in person. Which, if you ask me, is stupid.

Keep Reading... Show less
Currently

Harvard Just Announced Its 2020-21 School Year Will Be Taught Online — At Full $50K Tuition

While students attending degree-granting programs are set to pay the massive bill, Harvard still has widely available public courses that they offer for free.

Harvard University has announced that all classes for the 2020-2021 academic schedule will be held online. However, they will still be charging the typically more than $50,000 price tag to pay for tuition alone — a number that can inflate to more than $70,000 when additional costs are added together.

Keep Reading... Show less
Currently

ICE To International Students With Remote Fall Classes: Transfer Or Face Deportation

The new rule aims to pressure universities into holding in-person classes this fall.

In a news release on Monday, ICE announced that "The U.S. Department of State will not issue visas to students enrolled in schools and/or programs that are fully online for the fall semester nor will U.S. Customs and Border Protection permit these students to enter the United States."

Keep Reading... Show less
Currently

Elijah McClain's Case Is Being Reopened — His Family Is Still Waiting For Justice

The killing of an innocent Black man will be reinvestigated, and that news that brought me to tears.

9News / YouTube

On August 24, 2019, in Aurora, CO, a 23-year-old Black man named Elijah McClain was walking home from a convenience store after buying iced tea for his brother. He was wearing a ski mask because he was anemic and easily got cold. He was listening to music and dancing while he walked when someone called 911 on this Black man simply walking home.

Keep Reading... Show less
Currently

Despite COVID-19, Alabamans Return To Beaches

Noncompliance with CDC recommendations on beaches may contribute to outbreaks in Republican-controlled states.

Last week, I was in Orange Beach, AL. It, along with other Alabama beaches, seems to be quickly becoming a hotspot for coronavirus (COVID-19) cases, yet one could not discern this by observing the behavior of beachgoers. The situation on the ground was absolutely bonkers, and no one seemed to even be aware of the ongoing pandemic. Several restaurants that my family and I frequently visit on our annual trips to the beach had closed their doors this year due to an employee or employees contracting the virus. But at the ones that remained open, people neither wore masks nor maintained social distance.

Keep Reading... Show less

In a ruling on Thursday morning, the majority of the Supreme Court concluded that President Donald Trump is not immune to grand jury subpoenas.

Keep Reading... Show less
Currently

The Supreme Court Just Said Employers Can Deny Covering Birth Control, And It Wasn't Even A Close Vote

"Today, for the first time, the Court casts totally aside countervailing rights and interests in its zeal to secure religious rights to the nth degree..." — Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

The Supreme Court today ruled in line with the Trump Administration that your employer or university can deny covering birth control based on "religious or moral objection."

Keep Reading... Show less
Currently

A Vote For ANYONE Other Than Biden Is A Vote Against Someone You Love

We cannot afford a repeat of 2016’s botched election right now.

On Saturday, Kanye West announced on Twitter that he would be running for president in the 2020 election. It is hard to tell for sure if he is joking and this is all a publicity stunt or if he is serious. People were quick to point out that he had already missed the deadline to officially add his name to many states' ballots for the general election. Regardless, voters are still legally allowed to write in Kanye's name on their ballot, and there's a possibility that many young voters will do so.

Keep Reading... Show less
Facebook Comments