Smoking: A College Fad That Kills | The Odyssey Online
Start writing a post
Politics and Activism

Smoking: A College Fad That Kills

The five year anniversary of the FDA's failed anti-smoking campaign calls for a new and improved movement to deter smoking.

35
Smoking: A College Fad That Kills

When I first arrived on Lewis & Clark College's campus for a tour, I can honestly say the only upsetting aspect of the school was the amount of Designated Smoking Areas (DSAs) on campus. With eight DSAs on the undergraduate campus alone, I was shocked how readily available these smoking areas are to students. Lewis & Clark College is one of the many universities/colleges in the United States enabling, to some extent, the use of tobacco products. While there are studies proving the benefits of introducing DSAs to college campuses, I personally find them unfortunate features to the college community. My main reasoning is that, in the words of Dr. Nancy Rigotti, director of tobacco research and treatment at Massachusetts General Hospital in Boston, “College students are playing with fire, putting themselves at risk of a lifelong addiction to nicotine." While smoking among college students continues to rise, the trend "threatens to reverse the decline in U.S. adult smoking that we have witnessed over the past half-century.” Regardless of what age people begin to smoke cigarettes, something must be done to discontinue this unhealthy trend.

Upon researching possible past movements deterring people from smoking, I came across one that created quite a controversy. Five years ago this month, the Food and Drug Administration released photos documenting the damage smoking cigarettes can do to the human body.

Federal health officials selected the above nine photos to be printed on the top half of cigarette packages. This movement would have been the first major change in warning labels in more than a quarter of a century. The graphic images of blackened lungs, rotting teeth and an abscessed lower lip would give current smokers a glimpse of the unvarnished truth and hopefully persuade new smokers from continuing and deter non-smokers from beginning.

Big Tobacco, however, sued the FDA. Much like how the Oil Industry used their money to hide the detrimental effects of fossil fuels, Big Tobacco used their money to hide the gruesome effects of smoking cigarettes. In their lawsuit, Big Tobacco argued that these graphic warning labels "cross the line into governmental anti-smoking advocacy." In addition, their lawyers note that the FDA selected the images not to inform, but rather incite fear. Big Tobacco argued that these images were emotional and stripped the tobacco users of their right to make an educational decision. After a lengthy lawsuit, the industry won and Federal Judge Leon declared the FDA's requirement of graphic labels unconstitutional: “The government’s interest in advocating a message cannot and does not outweigh plaintiff’s First Amendment right to not be the government’s messenger."

While I can see the rights and wrongs for both sides of this lawsuit, my personal beliefs toward cigarettes make me bias towards the FDA's argument. Since elementary school, I have been taught about the harmful effects of smoking cigarettes. However, most of these lectures were fact and number based. While these facts are definitely important, it is a fair question to ask if they convey the same message as the images above.

Studies prove that 94 percent of Americans know that smoking cigarettes causes cancer. Although only 17.8 percent of Americans smoke cigarettes daily, these numbers do not add up. If you know the cold hard facts—such as smoking's direct link to cancer—why would you choose to engage in the harmful act?

In terms of argumentation, intellectual arguments, such as this lawsuit, are often approached with logical and factual statements. This lawsuit shows Big Tobacco and the FDA engaging in two separate types of arguing. Big Tobacco used intellectual argumentation and used facts to their advantage while the FDA used emotional argumentation and pathos. Emotion can come into play in cases where there is a trail by jury. This is because human beings are emotional creatures that respond strongly to emotional stimuli. It is proven that pathos arguments are more effective with uneducated audiences that are too lazy to think things through. While 94 percent of Americans know that smoking causes cancer, 17.8 percent are still smoking. Would this change if emotional stimuli, such as the pictures above, were posted on the packaging of cigarettes, college DSAs or played on TV?

The FDA's five year old controversial movement cannot be the end of our fight against cigarettes. The New York Times writes, "The Food and Drug Administration has deferred action for too long, and must meet the tobacco companies with the same vigor, audacity and urgency that the industry has employed so effectively for decades." Big Tobacco has owned Americans for too long and it is the FDA's responsibility to give Americans the public health service the law requires.

I believe we must slowly chip away at the hold the Tobacco Company has over America. Schools such as Seattle University chipping away by making their campuses tobacco/smoking free. Although this is a small step towards deterring students from smoking—and therefore hindering their addictions—a few small steps eventually add up.

So ask yourself, is there anything I can do today to keep America healthy?

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.
friends
tv.com

"Friends" maybe didn’t have everything right or realistic all the time, but they did have enough episodes to create countless reaction GIFs and enough awesomeness to create, well, the legacy they did. Something else that is timeless, a little rough, but memorable? Living away from the comforts of home. Whether you have an apartment, a dorm, your first house, or some sort of residence that is not the house you grew up in, I’m sure you can relate to most of these!

Keep Reading...Show less
man working on a laptop
Pexels

There is nothing quite like family.

Family is kinda like that one ex that you always find yourself running back to (except without all the regret and the angsty breakup texts that come along with it).

Keep Reading...Show less
bored kid
Google Images

No matter how long your class is, there's always time for the mind to wander. Much like taking a shower or trying to fall asleep, sitting in a classroom can be a time when you get some of your best ideas. But, more than likely, you're probably just trying to mentally cope with listening to a boring lecturer drone on and on. Perhaps some of the following Aristotle-esque thoughts have popped into your head during class.

Keep Reading...Show less
Entertainment

Advice To Live By As Told By Bob's Burgers

The Belchers hold the key to a better life.

1113
Bob's Burgers
Adult Swim

Bob's Burgers is arguably one of the best and most well-written shows on tv today. That, and it's just plain hilarious. From Louise's crazy antics to Tina's deadpan self-confidence, whether they are planning ways to take over school or craft better burgers, the Belchers know how to have fun. They may not be anywhere close to organized or put together, but they do offer up some wise words once and awhile.

Keep Reading...Show less
Rory Gilmore

We're in college, none of us actually have anything together. In fact, not having anything together is one of our biggest stressors. However, there's a few little things that we do ever so often that actually make us feel like we have our lives together.

1. Making yourself dinner

And no this does not include ramen or Annie's Mac & Cheese. Making a decent meal for yourself is one of the most adult things you can do living on campus. And the food is much better than it would be at the dining hall.

Keep Reading...Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments