Myths And Bad Arguments About The Second Amendment

Myths And Bad Arguments About The Second Amendment

What the Founding Fathers really meant when they wrote the Second Amendment

It all started with Columbine, then the Virginia Tech shooting happened, followed by the Aurora shooting and even more recently the shooting in Orlando, Florida. With all the hype surrounding the 2nd amendment after the shooting, I’d like to discuss a few myths about the 2nd amendment and my problem with one argument that the pro-gun side utilizes. The first myth is that the founding fathers wrote the 2nd amendment only with muskets in mind, and the second, while it isn't a myth, is the pro-gun argument of the Puckle gun.

The first myth I would like to tackle is the founding fathers only had muskets in mind when they wrote the Constitution. When I turn on the news, I will hear a left wing politician or reporter say that when the founding fathers said you can own a gun they did not mean you could have a modern military grade firearm. The problem with that argument is that, at the time when the Constitution was written, the musket was a modern military firearm. In fact, most people in the United States owned a rifle, which was far more accurate than a musket. In a lot of cases, militiamen would take their rifles into battle over the less accurate musket. The best example of this is the Battle of New Orleans in 1815, where an outnumbered rag tag group of farmers beat battle hardened British veterans of the Napoleonic wars, mainly because they were using their own rifles to pick the British off from a distance.

The next thing I want to talk about is the Puckle gun argument. For those of you who are unaware, the Puckle gun was invented in 1718 by James Puckle. It was the first “machine gun,” it had a rotating cylinder that allowed for a rate of fire of 9 rounds per minute versus the standard 3 rounds that a trained soldier could shoot. Overall, it was an utter failure, and it was never used in combat because of its terrible reliability. A better argument for people owning more extreme military hardware is that the private ownership of both field artillery and fully armed warships was allowed. Yes, people during that time were allowed to own fully functional field artillery and warships. During the War of 1812, the US government would give letters of Marque to privateers, who privately owned a fully functional warship. The practice of privateering was very widespread and it allowed for the private ownership of the most powerful piece of military hardware at the time.

While the founding fathers may not have known what firearms would have evolved into what they are today, they believed in the right to civilian ownership of military grade armaments. Like I stated before, the argument of the founding fathers writing the 2nd amendment with only muskets in mind is very faulty for the musket was a military grade firearm. And on the other side, the use of the Puckle gun argument is faulty as well because there are much better ways to spin that type of argument such as the artillery and warship argument.

Cover Image Credit: Photobucket

Popular Right Now

I Blame My Dad For My High Expectations

Dad, it's all your fault.

I always tell my dad that no matter who I date, he's always my number one guy. Sometimes I say it as more of a routine thing. However, the meaning behind it is all too real. For as long as I can remember my dad has been my one true love, and it's going to be hard to find someone who can top him.

My dad loves me when I am difficult. He knows how to keep the perfect distance on the days when I'm in a mood, how to hold me on the days that are tough, and how to stand by me on the days that are good.

He listens to me rant for hours over people, my days at school, or the episode of 'Grey's Anatomy' I watched that night and never once loses interest.

He picks on me about my hair, outfit, shoes, and everything else after spending hours to get ready only to end by telling me, “You look good." And I know he means it.

He holds the door for me, carries my bags for me, and always buys my food. He goes out of his way to make me smile when he sees that I'm upset. He calls me randomly during the day to see how I'm doing and how my day is going and drops everything to answer the phone when I call.

When it comes to other people, my dad has a heart of gold. He will do anything for anyone, even his worst enemy. He will smile at strangers and compliment people he barely knows. He will strike up a conversation with anyone, even if it means going way out of his way, and he will always put himself last.

My dad also knows when to give tough love. He knows how to make me respect him without having to ask for it or enforce it. He knows how to make me want to be a better person just to make him proud. He has molded me into who I am today without ever pushing me too hard. He knew the exact times I needed to be reminded who I was.

Dad, you have my respect, trust, but most of all my heart. You have impacted my life most of all, and for that, I can never repay you. Without you, I wouldn't know what I to look for when I finally begin to search for who I want to spend the rest of my life with, but it might take some time to find someone who measures up to you.

To my future husband, I'm sorry. You have some huge shoes to fill, and most of all, I hope you can cook.

Cover Image Credit: Logan Photography

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

Irish-American History Is Just As Important As Any Other Culture, You Can't Prove Me Wrong

I cherish being Irish and I will not let anyone let me feel bad for that.


Depending on when you're reading this, Saint Patrick's day has either just passed or is around the corner. For me, Saint Patrick's day is tomorrow. I've been debating this article for some time now because I didn't know how it would be perceived. At this point, though, I feel it's important for me to get out. No, Irish people were never kept as slaves in America, and I will never be one to try and say they were. However, Irish people were treated tremendously awful in America. A lot of people tend to forget, or just try to erase entirely, the history of the Irish in America. So much so that I felt shameful for wanting to celebrate my heritage. Therefore, I want to bring to light the history that everyone brushes under the rug.

In 1845, a potato famine broke out across Ireland. This was a big deal because the Irish lived off, mainly, potatoes. They were cheap, easy to grow, and had tons of nutrients. So when the famine struck, many people either died of starvation or fled to America in seek of refuge. When the Irish arrived in America they were seen as a threat to the decency of America. People viewed them as drunk beasts, sinful savages, barbaric, violent, belligerent, stupid, and white apes. When the Irish would go to look for jobs, many times they found signs that read "Irish Need Not Apply," even when the job was hiring. Therefore, the Irish did the jobs no one wanted, and even jobs African slaves wouldn't do. The biggest example of this is when Irishmen built canals and drained swamps. They were sent to do these things because of the enormous amount of mosquitoes; in the swamp, they would get bit and ultimately die of malaria.

Also, during this time, Irish people were poor and therefore lived in the same neighborhoods as the free African Americans. A lot of the Irish people were friendly with their neighbors of color and even got into interracial relationships. Because the Irish lived in these neighborhoods they were seen as dirty and even a lot of people at this time put African Americans higher on the totem pole than Irish. One person during the time even said, "At least the black families keep their homes clean."

The main reason American's outlook on Irish people changed was that most Irishmen took up fighting for the Union in the Civil War. I make this argument, not because I think the Irish suffered more than African slaves. I don't say this in means of trying to erase the struggles of the African slaves. I do not think that any of our ancestors should have been treated the way they were. I mean to say that the Irish did in fact suffer. Irish people were treated wrongly on the basis of...nothing. Simply because my ancestors hailed from the shores of Eire, they were treated with malice. And I write this simply because I want people to remember. I want people to understand what happened.

On Saint Patrick's Day this year, next year, and for the many years to come, I want people to embrace the Irish culture. I want the folks of Irish heritage to not be ashamed of where they come from; to not be ashamed to share their culture the way I have for many years. I want everyone to have a beer, wear some green, eat a potato or two, and dance the Irish step; to celebrate the history of Irish people with a bit more understanding than before.

Related Content

Facebook Comments