Is There a Difference Between Survival Actions and Wrongful Death?
Start writing a post

Is There a Difference Between Survival Actions and Wrongful Death?

Survival Actions and Wrongful Death?

Is There a Difference Between Survival Actions and Wrongful Death?

Losing a loved one can be highly traumatic. Especially when we lose a loved one due to someone else's avoidable negligence. The loss of a loved one can be devastating and we are often left with not just grief but severe financial troubles too.

If the deceased person was the family's sole breadwinner, a significant income source may be lost while accident-related expenses begin adding up. All is not lost. There are legal options that can help grieving families in the aftermath of such a tragedy. If you lose someone due to someone else's negligence, you have two options for filing a claim to recover damages.

Wrongful Death Lawyer

One is a wrongful death claim and the other is survival action. Both types of lawsuits offer the ability to pursue financial recovery for a family member's death. They are not the same, however, and there are differences between the purpose and mechanisms for filing them. You can contact a knowledgeable Wrongful Death Lawyer for a discussion on the best ways to win fair compensation for your losses and damages. He can stand by your side during this difficult time to handle the legalities while you focus on your family's tragedy.

Wrongful Death Claims

A wrongful death claim can be filed whenever a person is killed due to negligence, recklessness, or an intentional act of another person. These claims can arise from several types of accidents, such as medical malpractice, car crashes, slip and falls, and construction accidents. If a person is killed due to the fault of another person, it is possible to file a wrongful death lawsuit.

A wrongful death action is a particular type of legal claim filed to benefit the deceased's beneficiaries. It is brought on behalf of the dead person's family members, such as their parents, spouse, or children.

A personal representative can file a wrongful death action on behalf of the deceased person's surviving family. In a wrongful death claim, the lawsuit seeks damages designed to compensate the family for the loss they have experienced due to the death of their loved one.

While the damages vary, they will typically include:

●Compensation to the children for the loss of support and services that the deceased parent would have provided

●Medical expenses

●The value of the deceased person's anticipated financial contributions to the family

●Expenses related to the death itself, including funeral and burial costs, and the costs associated with estate administration

●The monetary value of support to the family for comfort, society, and services

As a general rule, damages recovered through a wrongful death claim are not subject to inheritance tax. Instead, they are distributed under the state's intestacy laws assuming that the deceased person did not have a will.

Survival Actions

A survival action is not made on behalf of the surviving family members like a wrongful death claim. It is an action brought on behalf of the deceased person's estate to compensate the person who died. A survival action is brought by the administrator of the deceased person's estate.

Long story short, the claims that a person would have had if they had survived can be brought against the party that caused the accident that killed them in a survival action.

Damages in a survival action include loss of gross earning power from the date of injury through death, pain, and suffering, and loss of earning power minus personal maintenance expenses from the time of death through the deceased person's estimated working life span.

A survival action is a direct claim made by the estate on behalf of the person who died, and so, the proceeds of this type of lawsuit go directly to the estate. Any judgment or settlement recovered due to a survival action may be subject to inheritance taxes as a result.

Differences Between the Two

1. The first difference between a survival action and a wrongful death claim is who can bring the claim. A survival action is brought on behalf of the deceased person by the personal representative of the estate. In contrast, a wrongful death lawsuit is brought on behalf of the spouse, parents, or children.

2. The type of damages that are recoverable is the second difference. A survival action seeks damages for the deceased person's losses, such as pain and suffering, as though he had survived the accident. At the same time, in wrongful death claims, the focus is on the losses suffered by the family, such as the loss of the deceased person's companionship, the loss of income and support, and medical and funeral expenses.

3. How the damages are distributed is the third difference between the two types of claims. Damages in a survival action are distributed under the terms of a deceased person's will and are subject to estate taxes and creditors' claims. In a wrongful death claim, the damages are distributed through the state's intestacy rules and are not subject to claims against the estate or estate taxes.

Despite the differences, there is one significant similarity between the two kinds of claims. In most states, the statute of limitations is two years for both wrongful death claims and survival actions, the same as for all negligence claims.

If someone in your family has died because of the negligence or the actions of another person, you may be able to file a claim for damages, either through survival action or a wrongful death claim. A New Jersey Personal Injury Attorney can evaluate your case and help.

You decide the best course of action according to your situation.

Report this Content
This article has not been reviewed by Odyssey HQ and solely reflects the ideas and opinions of the creator.

An open letter to my father

What you did sounds dumb to me

An open letter to my father
The Truth About My Parents' Divorce

Considering im 18 now & you're one of the best men i've ever met since you have a child; me. I want you to know that I love you, more than anyone, I love you. I don't forgive you for the way you hurt my mother. I'm hurt because you broke our family. Thing went down hill the day you found Laquita. You we're distant & shortly after my mother turned into the coldest, saddest women to walk past me. She's my best friend & so are you. Not one day goes by where I don't wonder what she did wrong. How on earth could you trade your family & the women who loved you unconditionally for a home wrecker? Sounds dumb to me.

Keep Reading... Show less

Is God Reckless?

Exploring the controversy behind the popular worship song "Reckless Love"

Is God Reckless?

First things first I do not agree with people getting so caught up in the specific theology of a song that they forget who they are singing the song to. I normally don't pay attention to negative things that people say about worship music, but the things that people were saying caught my attention. For example, that the song was not biblical and should not be sung in churches. Worship was created to glorify God, and not to argue over what kind of theology the artist used to write the song. I was not made aware of the controversy surrounding the popular song "Reckless Love" by Cory Asbury until about a week ago, but now that I am aware this is what I have concluded.The controversy surrounding the song is how the term reckless is used to describe God's love. This is the statement that Cory Asbury released after many people questioned his theology regarding his lyrics. I think that by trying to clarify what the song was saying he added to the confusion behind the controversy.This is what he had to say,
"Many have asked me for clarity on the phrase, "reckless love". Many have wondered why I'd use a "negative" word to describe God. I've taken some time to write out my thoughts here. I hope it brings answers to your questions. But more than that, I hope it brings you into an encounter with the wildness of His love.When I use the phrase, "the reckless love of God", I'm not saying that God Himself is reckless. I am, however, saying that the way He loves, is in many regards, quite so. What I mean is this: He is utterly unconcerned with the consequences of His actions with regards to His own safety, comfort, and well-being. His love isn't crafty or slick. It's not cunning or shrewd. In fact, all things considered, it's quite childlike, and might I even suggest, sometimes downright ridiculous. His love bankrupted heaven for you. His love doesn't consider Himself first. His love isn't selfish or self-serving. He doesn't wonder what He'll gain or lose by putting Himself out there. He simply gives Himself away on the off-chance that one of us might look back at Him and offer ourselves in return.His love leaves the ninety-nine to find the one every time."
Some people are arguing that song is biblical because it makes reference to the scripture from Matthew 28:12-14 and Luke 15. Both of these scriptures talk about the parable of the lost sheep and the shepherd. The shepherd symbolizes God and the lost sheep are people that do not have a relationship with God. On the other hand some people are arguing that using the term reckless, referring to God's character is heretical and not biblical. I found two articles that discuss the controversy about the song.The first article is called, "Reckless Love" By Cory Asbury - "Song Meaning, Review, and Worship Leading Tips." The writer of the article, Jake Gosselin argues that people are "Making a mountain out of a molehill" and that the argument is foolish. The second article, "God's Love is not Reckless, Contrary to What You Might Sing" by author Andrew Gabriel argues that using the term reckless is irresponsible and that you cannot separate Gods character traits from God himself. For example, saying that God's love is reckless could also be argued that God himself is reckless. Reckless is typically not a word that someone would use to describe God and his love for us. The term reckless is defined as (of a person or their actions) without thinking or caring about the consequences of an action. However, Cory Asbury is not talking about a person, he is talking about God's passionate and relentless pursuit of the lost. While I would not have chosen the word reckless, I understand what he was trying to communicate through the song. Down below I have linked two articles that might be helpful if you are interested in reading more about the controversy.

Keep Reading... Show less
Student Life

10 Signs You Grew Up In A Small Town

Whether you admit it or not, that tiny town will always have your heart.

The Odyssey

1. You still talk to people that you went to elementary school with.

These are the people you grew up with and the people you graduated high school with. The faces you see in kindergarten are the same faces you’ll see for the rest of your life.

Keep Reading... Show less
Student Life

150 Words For Anyone Who Loves Football Games

Why I love high school football games, even though I don't like football.

Dallas News

When most think of high school they think of friend drama, parties, getting your drivers license, and best of all foot ball games.

Keep Reading... Show less

10 Greatest Speeches In Modern American History

The United States is a relatively infantile nation, but its legacy of spoken rhetoric is one of the richest in the world.


Rhetoric, in all its forms, arrives under the scrutiny of historians both for its historical impact and literary value. Dozens of speeches have either rallied the nation together or driven it drastically apart –– the impact of speeches in politics, social movements, and wars is undeniable.

Keep Reading... Show less

Subscribe to Our Newsletter

Facebook Comments