Ego's Rationale for Unity

Ego's Rationale for Unity

Everyone Who Seeks Self Transcendence Must Unite For The Sake Of The Species

The human mind is made up of 3 aspects: the Ego, the Id, and the SuperEgo. The term Ego is not being used in the sense of narcissism, rather in the perspective of self interest required for survival. The interests required for survival is commonly known as the psychological hierarchy of needs. With the top of the hierarchy embodying ones innermost desires and dreams, the very final point on this hierarchy is known as "self transcendence". This phenomenon becomes known once an individual starts to transcend focus of attention from self interested needs into ideas that extend beyond the individual. This can be seen with people desiring to create a legacy for themselves to leave behind, or working towards leaving behind a legacy of a specific idea logical perspective or organization. Self transcendence is usually intended to act as a form of immortality that extends beyond the life of the physical body.

While this is a perfectly legitimate perspective which has contributed to what we call culture and civilization, a great crisis of our time threatens all of this. Since the collective efforts of individuals who have transcended their individual selves in building greater ambitions like cultures and civilizations are the combined efforts of billions of previously existing humans. This is a form of immortality that they have striven for, even if we don't directly remember their efforts in particular, is at risk of destruction. Should the human species ever destroy itself through conflict such as a nuclear exchange, or by forces of nature like climate change or extraterrestrial impacts; then this collected effort will swiftly end. Not only will past existing humans be disrupted, the billions of humans currently existing will have wasted all of their efforts to preserve their own self transcendence.

People who work their lives towards the efforts of something greater than themselves today must acknowledge that, if the human species does not survive, their immortality in the legacy of their work will cease. Everything that human civilization is is built upon all the work of millennia and eons of biological and cultural evolution which would end with the extinction of the species. While not everyone has the same philosophical intentions, the simple acts of our lives impact the momentum of the collective human mental progression of culture and civilization. If we don't check ourselves as a species and don't drastically and rapidly reorganize our civilization, everything we have been spending our lives doing will have been wasted.

Everyone is caught up in their own bubble world of existence where their perception and focus is largely angled in the direction of their own desires, needs, and wants. While it is not necessarily negative for everyone to have this mentality, we must come to terms that it is an obsolete and immature model that is too narrow for the 21st-century and its challenges. If the human species is to survive we must all strive to self transcend to the greatest extent of our own self focus. And embrace a much greater scale of perception that looks out for, and includes, the greater society and ecosystem in which we humans interact within. Our unification on the basic logical and rational basis to preserve the human species is a responsibility that we all must take; and will become an error and mistake that we will be held accountable, should we fail.

Cover Image Credit: Два.ч

Popular Right Now

An Open Letter to the Person Who Still Uses the "R Word"

Your negative associations are slowly poisoning the true meaning of an incredibly beautiful, exclusive word.

What do you mean you didn't “mean it like that?" You said it.

People don't say things just for the hell of it. It has one definition. Merriam-Webster defines it as, "To be less advanced in mental, physical or social development than is usual for one's age."

So, when you were “retarded drunk" this past weekend, as you claim, were you diagnosed with a physical or mental disability?

When you called your friend “retarded," did you realize that you were actually falsely labeling them as handicapped?

Don't correct yourself with words like “stupid," “dumb," or “ignorant." when I call you out. Sharpen your vocabulary a little more and broaden your horizons, because I promise you that if people with disabilities could banish that word forever, they would.

Especially when people associate it with drunks, bad decisions, idiotic statements, their enemies and other meaningless issues. Oh trust me, they are way more than that.

I'm not quite sure if you have had your eyes opened as to what a disabled person is capable of, but let me go ahead and lay it out there for you. My best friend has Down Syndrome, and when I tell people that their initial reaction is, “Oh that is so nice of you! You are so selfless to hang out with her."

Well, thanks for the compliment, but she is a person. A living, breathing, normal girl who has feelings, friends, thousands of abilities, knowledge, and compassion out the wazoo.

She listens better than anyone I know, she gets more excited to see me than anyone I know, and she works harder at her hobbies, school, work, and sports than anyone I know. She attends a private school, is a member of the swim team, has won multiple events in the Special Olympics, is in the school choir, and could quite possibly be the most popular girl at her school!

So yes, I would love to take your compliment, but please realize that most people who are labeled as “disabled" are actually more “able" than normal people. I hang out with her because she is one of the people who has so effortlessly taught me simplicity, gratitude, strength, faith, passion, love, genuine happiness and so much more.

Speaking for the people who cannot defend themselves: choose a new word.

The trend has gone out of style, just like smoking cigarettes or not wearing your seat belt. It is poisonous, it is ignorant, and it is low class.

As I explained above, most people with disabilities are actually more capable than a normal human because of their advantageous ways of making peoples' days and unknowingly changing lives. Hang out with a handicapped person, even if it is just for a day. I can one hundred percent guarantee you will bite your tongue next time you go to use the term out of context.

Hopefully you at least think of my friend, who in my book is a hero, a champion and an overcomer. Don't use the “R Word". You are way too good for that. Stand up and correct someone today.

Cover Image Credit: Kaitlin Murray

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

Sorry People, But #BelieveWomen Is #UnAmerican

Presumption of innocence is a core American value


There's a saying: "Lack of faith and blind faith - both are equally dangerous". Believing sexual assault accusers who are women just because they are women besides being the very definition of sexist - prejudice based on sex - is setting a harmful precedent on the way justice is served in this country. See, what this movement has done is changed justice from "prove guilt" to "prove innocence", an important and incredibly dangerous difference. Where is the due process that our Founding Fathers envisioned, fought, and died for?

Due process is an integral part of the reason why we have the United States of America. It was so important to our Founding Fathers that they included it in the Fourth, Fifth, Sixth, Eight (the Bill of Rights), and Fourteenth Amendments of the Constitution. It galls me to see how privileged modern day feminists are - so privileged they seemingly forget the freedoms this country affords them, so they may live their life, expect liberty, and be unhindered in their pursuit of happiness.

#BelieveWomen is a vigilante movement - and with vigilante justice the innocent always hang with the guilty, one of the very reasons for due process. I've heard the argument it's better to let innocent men rot in jail than have rapist men walk free, an argument, despite being incredibly moronic and unAmerican, that would not be made if the accused was a man close to the woman's heart. Because with the change to "prove innocence", the assumption will be guilt, and a confirmation bias will be created. Whereas if the assumption is innocence, the jury must be convinced beyond a reasonable doubt that a crime has occurred. I understand that a high percentage of rape accusations are truthful (I believe the number is in the high 90s), but the small percentage that are not means we cannot, in good conscience, assume guilt. To assume would damn some men to a fate they do not deserve, a fate they would have to endure simply because of their sex. Any real feminist should be appalled at how sexism is implicitly encouraged in this movement.

If you choose to #BelieveWomen in spite of everything I outlined, that is your prerogative, but you must #BelieveAllWomen. If your father, husband, boyfriend, or son gets accused, you must #BelieveWomen and stand with their accuser. Any less and your feminist privilege will show. Vocal #MeToo activist Lena Dunham has already shown her privilege - accusing actress Aurora Perrineau of lying about being assaulted by her friend Murray Miller. When the going gets hard, feminists rarely stick to their principles. And sadly, feminism - and the double standards it always brings - rears its ugly head once again.

Related Content

Facebook Comments