The Democrats Aren't Going To Tear Themselves Apart

Hot Take: The Democrats Aren't Going To Tear Themselves Apart

We are so accustomed to nasty politics that run on smear campaigns and social media attacks, rather than policy proposals and cordial debates that there seems to be no other option.


The common discussion going on right now is that the Democrats are going to tear themselves down before the 2020 candidate is decided. With each new Democrat added to the race, it seems more and more likely that the only way to make it to that coveted spot is for each candidate to play on the offensive and focus on breaking each of their opponents.

I disagree.

Of course with such highly qualified candidates each with their own respective name recognition, it could seem like the only way to make it to the top would be to make sure the others fall to the bottom. But, it should be recognized that these Democratic candidates (or at least the top-runners) are colleagues, not enemies.

For example, Cory Booker and Kamala Harris have worked on bills together during their time in the Senate, proving their ability not only to respect one another, but to collaborate to break down barriers.

Of course all of these Democrats want the nomination. They wouldn't run otherwise. However, they are also all professionals.

We are so accustomed to nasty politics that run on smear campaigns and social media attacks, rather than policy proposals and cordial debates that there seems to be no other option. I hope that this 2020 Democratic race proves otherwise.

With such amazing candidates, each bringing a unique perspective and plan to the table, I see so much potential for the best candidate to be shaped. Rather than dragging each other down, these candidates have the chance to build the best nomination. Now that is what Democrats want and need in 2020.

At this point, it's so easy to sit back and hope for some juicy headlines. However, we should really be hoping for some productive debate and campaigning that molds the best possible Presidential nominee.

May the best man or woman win.

Popular Right Now

I'm A Liberal And CNN Is Trash

I just want to read some unbiased news, OK?

Here's a fun brain teaser: When was the last time you watched, listened to, or read CNN news without feeling like liberal propaganda was being shoved down your throat? Can't remember? Neither do I. But you must be thinking, "Bri??? You're a raging liberal! Why would you hate liberal news outlets???"

Here's the thing, I have nothing against the occasional overly liberal article. In fact, sometimes I seek them out so I can hate read Trump articles to temporarily fill my endless black hole of a heart with something other than the eternal emptiness echoing...echoing.

Basically, CNN has become an outlet to hate read about Trump, like how any other unreputable magazine lets you hate read about the Kardashians. That's honestly what CNN has become: Keeping Up With The Trumps. It has all of the delicious bits of a reality show plus the actual threat of a nuclear war!

But really, what happened to actual reporting? CNN will take one topic (ie. Trump is a bad president) and play it on an endless loop. All. Day. Long. We get it, Trump has absolutely no idea what he's doing, that's been stated and proven multiple times, now can we talk about something else?

Like the Turkish-Kurdish conflict? Or that the Grumpy Cat won $710,000 payout in copyright lawsuit? A cat literally won over half a million dollars and the people at CNN are still crapping themselves about Russian collusion.

This isn't to say that Fox news is any better. Fox news is a dumpster fire with blonde hair that defied all laws of nature to hack up a grotesque, slobbering hole of a mouth filled with nothing but one tooth and a limp grey tongue that somehow manages to screech out "All lives matter!" at least once a day. But since I'm a liberal, I'll stay in my lane and focus on CNN.

Going back to my previous point, CNN will take one topic and beat the hell out of it. That's not news reporting, that's a poorly written TV show. Even the writers at The Big Bang Theory managed to come up with new ideas every week, so why can't a national news source? And it's not like CNN has to come up with an entirely new plot line every week because, surprise! the news is literally happening all around us all the time.

The sad thing is is that when you start watching or listening to CNN you can easily get sucked into their suck hole of a news source. I was driving to a doctor's appointment the other day and was mindlessly listening to CNN with the phrases "Russian collusion" and "Did he or did he not say Africa was a shithole" banging around in my head. And then something incredible happened. I switched the channel.

Now don't get too excited, I still kept it on a news channel. But, I switched it to the BBC. And it was like the heavens opened up and a choir of angels literally came down in my car and sang Ave Maria into my ears. What's amazing about the BBC is that they switch their topics!

Imagine: A news reporter discusses the tension between North and South Korea, an hour passes, and now they're talking about something else!

I don't want to discredit all of the content that is on CNN. What they report is important, such as the Nassar trial and the truly awful things that Trump does, like calling the countries in Africa shitholes or refusing to resign.

However, they need to extract the bias, change their topics every once in a while, and inform viewers rather than perpetuate party propaganda.

CNN, I challenge you to rise above party politics and do some actual news reporting. I don't get the BBC on my TV, I get Fox news and CNN, and I'm sure as hell not going to watch Fox news. I just want a news source where I get the facts without a side of bias. Is that really too much to ask?

Cover Image Credit: Wikipedia commons

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

Pete Buttigieg Is On Everybody's Radar Now, But Can Mayor Pete Really Become President Pete?

Charisma, polyglot and success in reviving a Midwestern city make him a viable candidate for president. But will this hold?


At the time of writing this, at least 18 people are vying for the Democratic Party nomination to challenge Donald Trump during the Presidential election in 2020. This includes some heavyweights, such as Senator Bernie Sanders, Senator Kamala Harris and Senator Cory Booker. There are also fringe candidates, like Andrew Yang. Then there are the formerly fringe candidates. One person fits that bill: Pete Buttigieg, the mayor of South Bend, Indiana.

Pete Buttigieg has erupted as a potential candidate for the Presidency. He recently took 9% of a recent poll in Iowa, the state that begins the general election season. The question is this: why has he gained so much traction? There are several potential reasons.

First, Mayor Pete has, at least compared to Trump, significant governmental experience as the mayor of South Bend. He has been mayor since 2011. He began his time in office at the age of 29 and has since been re-elected with 80% of the vote in 2015. His success in the city has shown: the city experienced significant growth following a population decline between 2000-2010.

The Mayor has also spearheaded some rebirth projects in the city, including converting the old Studebaker plant in town into a tech hub, conversion of the city streets downtown, and millions of dollars of private investment into the city. As a result, Mayor Pete can tout his success here as examples of why he could be president.

Other supporters claim that he is immensely talented and intelligent (though I do not like this reasoning). Mayor Pete was a Rhodes Scholar after attending Harvard. He knows myriad languages, including Norwegian. He is well-acquainted with various philosophies, including that of well-known intellectual Antonio Gramsci, whom his father has written on.

Though this line of thinking is flawed (I mean, Julian Castro attended Stanford, Cory Booker was also a Rhodes Scholar and Elizabeth Warren lectured at Harvard Law School), it is easy to see WHY he resonates: when compared to the President, Pete is levels above him.

Finally, a lot of what he says resonates with people. He speaks about his faith with fervor and honesty, something I appreciate greatly. He talks about the virtues of progressive politics and supporting policies like universal healthcare, labor unionism, combating climate change among other policies. His youth ideals combined are valued by many.

However, Pete still has his critics. Concerns about the gentrification of the city, wiretapping, and targeting of vacant properties that led to accusations of targeting of minorities in the city are what concerns many people. There were also previous issues with the police chief in the town, who recorded conversations, and who he demoted, which raised concerns for racial bias.

Whether or not this affects the primary at all is anyone's guess. However, he has momentum. Maybe Mayor Pete will become President Pete someday.

Related Content

Facebook Comments