Dear Timothée Chamalet, Why'd You Lie About Your Obligations To Woody Allen?

Dear Timothée Chamalet, Why'd You Lie About Your Obligations To Woody Allen?

Were you only interested in appeasing your fans?

As the “Time’s Up” movement grew in popularity, many actors were seen voicing their support. Timothée Chamalet was among them, and his fan base fell even more in love with him when he spoke out about how he was happy the movement was gaining traction. Chamalet then began to gain a good reputation for using his celebrity status to talk about the prevalence of college campus sexual assaults, but public opinion of him quickly changed when it was revealed that he had been continuously avoiding the question of why he made a film with Woody Allen, a known rapist.

It is a running theme for men in Hollywood to say they are supportive of women’s rights because they think it is something “trendy” to talk about that will help them gain popularity. Chamalet seemed to be using this same tactic and his fans continued telling him he was a hypocrite for working with Woody Allen and that they expected more from him. Eventually, he broke his silence and said that he had not answered anybody’s questions on his decision to work with Allen because his contract prevented him from doing so. However, he had decided to donate his salary from the film to TIME’S UP, The LGBT Center in New York, and RAINN.

Chamalet’s fans praised him for trying to correct his mistake by choosing to not profit from the film. It meant that he was actually genuine when talking about how it is important to discuss how sexual assault it more common than some people think. I was relieved when I saw his post explaining why he had been unable to share his thoughts on Woody Allen because I considered myself a fan of his as well. I rarely see celebrities that actually want to make an effort to stand for women’s rights, so I saw it as a welcomed change that Chamalet wanted to give money to organizations that fight back against people like Allen. For a short period of time, it seemed like his association with Allen was water under the bridge, until it was revealed that his reason for making no comment on Allen’s crimes were fake.

The Huffington Post got access to Chamalet’s contract from a source and explained that “Chalamet is under no contractual obligation to remain silent about his thoughts with respect to Allen, nor does it prevent him from offering support to Dylan Farrow.” Unfortunately, it seems like he is just like most celebrities that claim to be advocates for women’s rights. They only say they do in order to appease their fanbase, when in reality they do not care. Chamalet’s representatives contacted the Huffington Post and told them that there was a clause in the standard SAG agreement that was a part of his contract that would not allow him to comment on the accusations against Allen. However, the Huffington Post hired two attorneys to review the clause in Chamalet’s contract and they found that it did not stop him from sharing his opinion on Allen.

I have yet to see Chamalet make any other statements after this news was revealed, and I doubt that I will. His only reason for “supporting” victims of sexual assault was to stop the hate he was receiving from his fans for working with Allen and to be seen in a positive light by the rest of the public. The Huffington Post explained that the purpose of Chamalet’s initial statement may have been to convince the members of the Screen Actors Guild to vote for him because his statement was released a few days before voting ended. Either way, he has been exposed for using the gaining popularity of the feminist movement to his advantage, and it would take an extremely good explanation in order for his actions to be forgiven.

Cover Image Credit: Pixabay

Popular Right Now

I'm The Girl Who'd Rather Raise A Family Than A Feminist Protest Sign

You raise your protest picket signs and I’ll raise my white picket fence.

Social Media feeds are constantly filled with quotes on women's rights, protests with mobs of women, and an array of cleverly worded picket signs.

Good for them, standing up for their beliefs and opinions. Will I be joining my tight-knit family of the same gender?

Nope, no thank you.

Don't get me wrong, I am not going to be oblivious to my history and the advancements that women have fought to achieve. I am aware that the strides made by many women before me have provided us with voting rights, a voice, equality, and equal pay in the workforce.

SEE ALSO: To The Girl Who Would Rather Raise A Family Than A Feminist Protest Sign

For that, I am deeply thankful. But at this day in age, I know more female managers in the workforce than male. I know more women in business than men. I know more female students in STEM programs than male students. So what’s with all the hype? We are girl bosses, we can run the world, we don’t need to fight the system anymore.

Please stop.

Because it is insulting to the rest of us girls who are okay with being homemakers, wives, or stay-at-home moms. It's dividing our sisterhood, and it needs to stop.

All these protests and strong statements make us feel like now we HAVE to obtain a power position in our career. It's our rightful duty to our sisters. And if we do not, we are a disappointment to the gender and it makes us look weak.

Weak to the point where I feel ashamed to say to a friend “I want to be a stay at home mom someday.” Then have them look at me like I must have been brain-washed by a man because that can be the only explanation. I'm tired of feeling belittled for being a traditionalist.


Because why should I feel bad for wanting to create a comfortable home for my future family, cooking for my husband, being a soccer mom, keeping my house tidy? Because honestly, I cannot wait.

I will have no problem taking my future husband’s last name, and following his lead.

The Bible appoints men to be the head of a family, and for wives to submit to their husbands. (This can be interpreted in so many ways, so don't get your panties in a bunch at the word “submit”). God specifically made women to be gentle and caring, and we should not be afraid to embrace that. God created men to be leaders with the strength to carry the weight of a family.

However, in no way does this mean that the roles cannot be flipped. If you want to take on the responsibility, by all means, you go girl. But for me personally? I'm sensitive, I cry during horror movies, I'm afraid of basements and dark rooms. I, in no way, am strong enough to take on the tasks that men have been appointed to. And I'm okay with that.

So please, let me look forward to baking cookies for bake sales and driving a mom car.

And I'll support you in your endeavors and climb to the top of the corporate ladder. It doesn't matter what side you are on as long as we support each other, because we all need some girl power.

Cover Image Credit: Unsplash

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

The Gillette Controversy: Should Companies Share Their Views?

"We Believe: The Best Men Can Be" by Gillette is about creating a conversation, whether you agree with the commercial or not.


We Believe: The Best Men Can Be | Gillette (Short Film)

January 13, 2019, Gillette released a commercial that takes a new focus on their tagline "The Best a Man Can Get." The commercial weighs in on the Me Too movement and showcases different moments of toxic masculinity.

These moments include boys bullying another boy through cyberbullying, two young boys beating each other up while fathers are watching them saying that "boys will be boys", a set of a 1950s sitcom where a man grabs his maids butt to which the audience is encouraged to applause and laugh at his act, and a businessman laughing at his female colleague's statement and then says to the other male colleagues, "What I actually think she means…"

A voiceover in the ad says, "Is this the best a man can get? Is it? We can't hide from it, it's been going on far too long. We can't laugh it off, making the same old excuses. But something finally changed [implying the Me Too movement and people speaking up], and there will be no going back..."

The commercial then shifts to showing a man stepping in when another man tells a woman to smile, when a man stops another man from following a woman down the street, and video clips of men stopping fights and having two boys shake hands, as well as a father encouraging his daughter to say she is strong. There is also a moment when a father from the "boys will be boys" scene tells those kids fighting, "This is not how we treat each other."

The voiceover continues with "...Because we…We believe in the best in men. To say the right thing. To act the right way. Some already are, in ways big and small. But 'some' is not enough. Because the boys watching today will be the men of tomorrow."

This commercial sparked controversy with people saying that not all men show toxic masculinity, many people saying that this commercial is anti-male, and people saying they will now boycott Gillette and their partner company. Whereas others are praising the commercial with many saying that, if you're offended by this commercial, then that is why it was made.

But regardless of what you think of the commercial as a whole, the big topic of discussion is whether or not it is okay if companies should be political and put their two cents in through marketing.

I say yes.

I believe it is very okay for companies to express their thoughts and concerns about political and social issues through marketing. When the Me Too movement first came into the light, many people wanted Hollywood to stay out of politics/social issues. The public did not want to hear about the sexual harassment allegations throughout Hollywood, however, because of these celebrities bringing light to this issue more and more people, celebrity or not, are coming forward and speaking their truths.

More and more people are realizing the signs of harassment and speaking up before it can get worse. Society is more aware of these social issues because people with a platform are talking about it. Unfortunately, many people still do not want to listen to people with platforms, but having the conversation is important, so how else can we keep the conversation going?

That is where commercial and other forms of advertisements can come in. The commercial did exactly what it intended to do: to create a conversation. Talk shows like "The View" or "The Talk" are talking about, news outlets are talking about it, people on YouTube are talking about it, and here I am writing an Odyssey article related to the topic.

The commercial created conversation. It got people thinking about and discussing their concerns, their feelings about the idea of toxic masculinity, as well as how this commercial could or could not be the new wave of change. It is important to have conversations, as it is the only way for things to change and for people to see that how things used to be are not the way they should be now.

Related Content

Facebook Comments