Apathy And Climate Change

Apathy And Climate Change

It's the end of the world as we know it, and we all feel fine
412
views

So, climate change. That huge, unstoppable force that most of us try not to think about during the majority of our existence, even if we believe whole-heartedly that it does indeed exist and has largely human causes.

We’re reminded of its horrific scope only when we read articles like “The Uninhabitable Earth” or “This is how your world can end.” These apocalyptic views of the future are so incredibly bleak that they’re difficult to even wrap one’s mind around.

We forget that there are people that still disagree with the basic principle that it exists (if you are one of those people, I’m not going to try to convince you).

We forget that there are people seriously considering colonizing Mars or the moon (find sources), two places with no resources able to sustain human life, in order to escape what truly seems inevitable.

We forget that the United States left the agreement that may have been our best shot at preventing some of the more extreme visions of climate change from being realized. We forget that the current administration has gutted the government agency tasked with protecting the environment. (Find sources)

Even during weeks like this, when weather patterns all over America, and the world as a whole, seem to be going haywire, climate change seems to be an afterthought. A casual comment in a conversation about how it’s ten degrees warmer in New York than LA, isn’t that strange? Maybe that’s just my limited worldview talking, but it often seems like no one cares. Myself included.

To be fair, it can seem like no one cares about a lot of issues. But you would think that people would care about something that could potentially lead to their own misfortunes and upend their entire lives.

An article in Psychology Today states that this lack of caring is because the issue is simply too large for people to comprehend. It’s not specific enough, and thus can feel that it is too overwhelming to do anything substantial about. This has to do with the idea of statistical numbing; if someone tells us that millions of children are dying in a far-off place, we feel as though there is nothing we can do to solve this situation, but if we are shown a picture of one dying child, we feel as though we can make a difference in this child’s life.

Maybe part of the problem with climate change specifically is that grand, apocalyptic warnings a la An Inconvenient Truth don’t show people the human side of the issue. They’re incredibly important in terms of educating people, but they’re too broad to inspire change on a human level.

One can ask whether there’s even any point in caring about an issue that at this point seems unstoppable. Taking shorter showers and riding a bike instead of driving every once in a while isn’t going to stop sea level rise or save the polar bears. Because what we really need is structural change: we need the people in power to actually care about this. And they don’t.

No amount of calling our congressional representatives or marching in the streets is going to convert those who are backed by oil companies. But if we do absolutely nothing, this vicious cycle continues. Unfortunately, the only truly effective way for citizens to exert power in this capitalist society is through our purchasing power. So in actuality, all those insignificant-seeming decisions to take public transit, buy solar panels, eat less meat, and recycle do add up. One perk of overpopulation is that “the masses” are now nearly 7 billion strong, while those in power are still a relatively miniscule number.

If those 7 billion care, we have some hope.

Cover Image Credit: Pixabay

Popular Right Now

Dear Senator Walsh, I Can't Wait For The Day That A Nurse Saves Your Life

And I hope you know that when it is your time, you will receive the best care. You will receive respect and a smile. You will receive empathy and compassion because that's what we do and that is why we are the most trusted profession.

1042
views

Dear Senator Walsh,

I can't even fathom how many letters you've read like this in the past 72 hours. You've insulted one of the largest, strongest and most emotion-filled professions.. you're bound to get a lot of feedback. And as nurses, we're taught that when something makes us mad, to let that anger fuel us to make a difference and that's what we're doing.

I am not even a nurse. I'm just a nursing student. I have been around and I've seen my fair share of sore legs and clinical days where you don't even use the bathroom, but I am still not even a nurse yet. Three years in, though, and I feel as if I've given my entire life and heart to this profession. My heart absolutely breaks for the men and women who are real nurses as they had to wake up the next morning after hearing your comments, put on their scrubs and prepare for a 12-hour day (during which I promise you, they didn't play one card game).

I have spent the last three years of my life surrounded by nurses. I'm around them more than I'm around my own family, seriously. I have watched nurses pass more medications than you probably know exist. They know the side effects, dosages and complications like the back of their hand. I have watched them weep at the bedside of dying patients and cry as they deliver new lives into this world. I have watched them hang IV's, give bed baths, and spoon-feed patients who can't do it themselves. I've watched them find mistakes of doctors and literally save patient's lives. I have watched them run, and teach, and smile, and hug and care... oh boy, have I seen the compassion that exudes from every nurse that I've encountered. I've watched them during their long shifts. I've seen them forfeit their own breaks and lunches. I've seen them break and wonder what it's all for... but I've also seen them around their patients and remember why they do what they do. You know what I've never once seen them do? Play cards.

The best thing about our profession, Senator, is that we are forgiving. The internet might be blown up with pictures mocking your comments, but at the end of the day, we still would treat you with the same respect that we would give to anyone. That's what makes our profession so amazing. We would drop anything, for anyone, anytime, no matter what.

You did insult us. It does hurt to hear those comments because from the first day of nursing school we are reminded how the world has zero idea what we do every day. We get insulted and disrespected and little recognition for everything we do sometimes. But you know what? We still do it.

When it's your time, Senator, I promise that the nurse taking care of you will remember your comments. They'll remember the way they felt the day you publicly said that nurses "probably do get breaks. They probably play cards for a considerable amount of the day." The jokes will stop and it'll eventually die down, but we will still remember.

And I hope you know that when it is your time, you will receive the best care. You will receive respect and a smile. You will receive empathy and compassion because that's what we do and that is why we are the most trusted profession.

Please just remember that we cannot properly take care of people if we aren't even taken care of ourselves.

I sincerely pray that someday you learn all that nurses do and please know that during our breaks, we are chugging coffee, eating some sort of lunch, and re-tying our shoes... not playing cards.

Related Content

Connect with a generation
of new voices.

We are students, thinkers, influencers, and communities sharing our ideas with the world. Join our platform to create and discover content that actually matters to you.

Learn more Start Creating

Dear Nancy Pelosi, 16-Year-Olds Should Not Be Able To Vote

Because I'm sure every sixteen year old wants to be rushing to the voting booth on their birthday instead of the BMV, anyways.

285
views

Recent politicians such as Nancy Pelosi have put the voting age on the political agenda in the past few weeks. In doing so, some are advocating for the voting age in the United States to be lowered from eighteen to sixteen- Here's why it is ludicrous.

According to a study done by "Circle" regarding voter turnout in the 2018 midterms, 31% of eligible people between the ages of 18 and 29 voted. Thus, nowhere near half of the eligible voters between 18 and 29 actually voted. To anyone who thinks the voting age should be lowered to sixteen, in relevance to the data, it is pointless. If the combination of people who can vote from the legal voting age of eighteen to eleven years later is solely 31%, it is doubtful that many sixteen-year-olds would exercise their right to vote. To go through such a tedious process of amending the Constitution to change the voting age by two years when the evidence doesn't support that many sixteen-year-olds would make use of the new change (assuming it would pass) to vote is idiotic.

The argument can be made that if someone can operate heavy machinery (I.e. drive a car) at sixteen, they should be able to vote. Just because a sixteen-year-old can (in most places) now drive a car and work at a job, does not mean that they should be able to vote. At the age of sixteen, many students have not had fundamental classes such as government or economics to fully understand the political world. Sadly, going into these classes there are students that had mere knowledge of simple political knowledge such as the number of branches of government. Well, there are people above the age of eighteen who are uneducated but they can still vote, so what does it matter if sixteen-year-olds don't know everything about politics and still vote? At least they're voting. Although this is true, it's highly doubtful that someone who is past the age of eighteen, is uninformed about politics, and has to work on election day will care that much to make it to the booths. In contrast, sixteen-year-olds may be excited since it's the first time they can vote, and likely don't have too much of a tight schedule on election day, so they still may vote. The United States does not need people to vote if their votes are going to be uneducated.

But there are some sixteen-year-olds who are educated on issues and want to vote, so that's unfair to them. Well, there are other ways to participate in government besides voting. If a sixteen-year-old feels passionate about something on the political agenda but can't vote, there are other ways of getting involved. They can canvas for politicians whom they agree with, or become active in the notorious "Get Out The Vote" campaign to increase registered voter participation or help register those who already aren't. Best yet, they can politically socialize their peers with political information so that when the time comes for all of them to be eighteen and vote, more eighteen-year-olds will be educated and likely to vote.

If you're a sixteen-year-old and feel hopeless, you're not. As the 2016 election cycle approached, I was seventeen and felt useless because I had no vote. Although voting is arguably one of the easiest ways to participate in politics, it's not the only one. Since the majority of the current young adult population don't exercise their right to vote, helping inform them of how to stay informed and why voting is important, in my eyes is as essential as voting.

Sorry, Speaker Pelosi and all the others who think the voting age should be lowered. I'd rather not have to pay a plethora of taxes in my later years because in 2020 sixteen-year-olds act like sheep and blindly vote for people like Bernie Sanders who support the free college.

Related Content

Facebook Comments